- Atharv Bakshi (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
31 May 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Both the sockmaster and the sockpuppet uses the same style of edit summaries: "Pls don't change my edit" -- DaxServer (talk) 18:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
It is not the only IP address being used
-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Awaiting administrative action - ducky based on the summaries, the fact that both the account and the IP seem to almost exclusively make tweaks to infoboxes ([1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]) and the overlap. The master is currently indefinitely partial-blocked from mainspace so they start communicating; this does not appear to be a WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU issue – based on the tags, they should be seeing the messages. Please upgrade the master's block to sitewide for socking and, if someone gets to this soon enough, block 2401:4900:47F9:B726::/64 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) for 48 hours. Anything longer than that wouldn't do any good. FYI ping to Valereee, who placed the partial block. Thanks. --Blablubbs|talk 20:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked as requested. Leaving whether to place tags on the master etc. to Blablubbs. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged. @Toddy1: That's definitely them, but unfortunately, the IPs here are absurdly dynamic – by the time someone would get to blocking this one, they'll be on a new one. It seems that the only effective rangeblock here would be 2401:4900::/32 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), but that range is absurdly busy and the collateral wouldn't be justifiable at this time. I see their edits have been reverted – I'm afraid that's all we can do for now. Closing. --Blablubbs|talk 07:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
01 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
The IP user is also using the same format of edit summaries "Pls don't change my edit" and is changing the images in the articles, like the same as sockmaster and other puppets -- DaxServer (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Here is another: Special:Contributions/223.225.32.216-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
02 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Uses the same style of edit summaries: "Pls don't change my edit" and changes the images in Infobox -- DaxServer (talk) 10:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
04 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Same edit summary style as of other socks and master. Changes infobox pictures. Please verify range for IPv6. -- DaxServer (talk) 18:48, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
08 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Please check the range as well. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
09 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Same as other socks -- DaxServer (talk) 15:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
10 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Same as other socks. The second IP is already range blocked. -- DaxServer (talk) 13:58, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
11 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Same as others -- DaxServer (talk) 09:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
13 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
-- DaxServer (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
17 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
It looks like Atharv Bakshi has learnt not to use the same edit summaries. This account has reverted the block evasion revert Special:Diff/1028986820. As Bakshi uses dynamic IPs, it is unfortunately difficult to match using IPs. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk endorsed - seeing as the trademark edit summary is left out and as there are only a few edits a CU seems useful for confirmation incase this is a different person. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 12:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Unlikely. They're in the same country, but in different geolocations. Different ranges, ISP, user agents. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
20 June 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Both uses same edit summary'Please don't change my edit' Nitesh003 (talk) 07:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
19 June 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
Same edit(s) and edit summary as the master — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Indeed: [10][11]. Awaiting administrative action - please indef the sock. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]