user:Cybolton First edit: 1:39, 16 June 2013 was to create his user page [1]
User:TechatologyOn 12:35, 4 July 2013 starts reviewing articles at AfC
First edit : 13:43, 16 June 2013 was to create his user page [2] - two hours after Cybolton
On 11:59, 3 July 2013 his 7th edit is to award Cybolton a barnstar [3]
His 13th edit is a page move [4]
By 6 July he begins concentrating in earnest on AfC.
Accepts an AfC submission from Cybolton on 19:27, 5 July 2013 : [5], 03:59, 6 July 2013 [6] declines one on 04:07, 6 July 2013 [7] Thanks Cybolton 19:07, 6 July 2013 for good work [8]
Accepts an AfC submission from Cybolton 1:30, 6 July 2013 [9]
Accepts an AfC submission from Cybolton 9:56, 12 July 2013 [10]
Accepts an AfC submission from Cybolton 20:36, 12 July 2013 [11]
Accepts an AfC submission from Cybolton within the same minute 20:36, 12 July 2013 [12]
Accepts an AfC submission from Cybolton 13:34, 14 July 2013 [13]
Accepts an AfC submission from Cybolton 20:35, 14 July 2013 [14]
Both use a similar font and large size <font face="rage italic" size="12" style="color:blue">, and <font face="chiller" size="20" style="color:green" >
Stalk tool[15] shows articles that both users have edited. As one example, this edit history shows a close shared interest, while this history [16] shows shared interest within a minute of page creation.
These users seem to be sitting ducks and I am tempted to block them summarily. However, I'm asking for a CU because in the light of User:Techatology's experience, there may be other multiple accounts and/or sleepers. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Account created after Cybolton blocked and [17] contains almost all articles created or edited by Cybolton and puppets. I am One of Many (talk) 04:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
A new editor who out of the blue creates a beautiful userpage that happens to look very similar to the known sockpuppetteer Cybolton. Marks all his edits as minor, just as Cybolton did with his edits. Both have the same interests. And on top of all, after flagging AFP Modernization Act, Siryuseditor came to the rescue and removed the templates stating that the article was perfectly okay.
The quacking is that loud, that a check on sleepers seems useful. The Banner talk 03:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.