DantheWikipedian

DantheWikipedian (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

28 August 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Account editing same pages as blocked user User:DantheWikipedian AntientNestor (talk) 12:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


08 September 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar edits to DantheWikipedian, adding copyrighted text to Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool (source, edit). Preemptively started a thread on the article's talk page (Talk:Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool#On this Article) instructing other editors not to remove content that they added; DantheWikipedian had a similar combative discussion style (no need to cite diffs, their talk page is filled with examples). Admitted in a now-archived Teahouse thread that they were frustrated that DantheWikipedian's edits had been reverted. Including IPs with similar edits for posterity. SamX [talk · contribs] 16:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


19 December 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Has added uncited copyvio to Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool from the same website that DantheWikipedian and his socks used (cf. Special:DeletedContributions/DantheWikipedian and Special:DeletedContributions/DavidDunnymede). Username is very similar to at least two confirmed socks. Interaction analyzer (DantheWikipedian, DavidDunnymede) appears to indicate a connection. SamX [talk · contribs] 18:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy: Thanks. Part of the reason why I request CU was to check for sleepers as Girth Summit apparently found some back in August, but I'll obviously defer to your judgement. I suppose I should've mentioned that in the request. SamX [talk · contribs] 23:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Quite a bit of quacking emanating from 112.134.165.178 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) and other IPs on that range. SamX [talk · contribs] 23:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, thanks. I've started a sort of mini-CCI in my sandbox with some other IPs that have made similar edits, although most of them have been quiet for long enough that there's probably no action needed with them for the time being. SamX [talk · contribs] 23:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


20 December 2023

Suspected sockpuppets



In addition to the similar edits and edit summaries, one give-away are the curly quotes that are a consistent presence. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments