Deedeedee Steven

Deedeedee Steven (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
13 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

The user did admit that his/her other accounts were banned (blocked) on his/her own user talk page, before it was removed by that user. All of these accounts start with Deedeedee and are vandalism-only accounts. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


17 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

There was a discussion concerning a series of "Deedeedee" accounts recently on ANI. Better to be safe than sorry? PrincessWortheverything (talk) 23:57, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
14 December 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Two edits [1] [2] which were targetted at User talk:Deedeedee Andy. Furthermore, the user name and edit text in the aforementioned diffs is highly suggestive of a sockpuppet account. This current account appears to purely be a vandalism-only account, same as the accounts in the previous sockpuppet case. SMC (talk) 02:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, BackFromTheDeeDeeDead appears to be another sockpuppet with this edit. SMC (talk) 02:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Got another one - DoneWithDeDeDeee. SMC (talk) 03:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

13 July 2015

Suspected sockpuppets

Self-identifed with this edit. General Ization Talk 03:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 May 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Quack. Been quite a while since we've seen him around. GABHello! 00:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

25 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Edits clearly speak for themselves. JDDJS (talk) 05:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC) I request a checkuser because it's possible that he has already created other socks that he hasn't used yet. JDDJS (talk) 06:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note I blocked indef after seeing a report at WP:AIV. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 06:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12 November 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


Self-declared sock on top of username similarities. This is a Pro-forma report of sorts. TheSandDoctor Talk 03:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

12 November 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

User page admits this is a sockpuppet account of User:Deedeedee Steven "And also pretty much every single account on here with the name Deedeedee". User:Deedeedee Steven is a suspected sockpuppet of User:DawnoftheDeeDeeDee. Taking this account at face value it is a sockpuppet account. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 03:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@ST47: I wasn't aware of this when I opened Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deedeedee Steven. Do you think that that one should be merged here now? --TheSandDoctor Talk 04:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@TheSandDoctor: Actually, based on the archive template on this page, I think this case should be merged to / archived to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deedeedee Steven, as it seems to have been moved there at some point in the past. ST47 (talk) 04:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There are parallel edit histories, so I think a histmerge would be too messy here. I just did a cut-and-paste move from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DawnoftheDeeDeeDee to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deedeedee Steven—that's probably the cleanest solution. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

27 December 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Certainly not here to build an encyclopedia 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 December 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

AntiDionysius (talk) 22:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

More