Dragonfly009 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Support009 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Within 35 minutes of me starting an AfD discussion on an article (Kieran Goodwin) which Dragonfly009 created (which incidentally looks to me like an autobiography, given the presence of unpublished personal details added by the contributor), Support009 turned up at the AfD - a new account, with no prior editing history. I would also suggest that the prior edit history of the article concerned [1] suggests prior use of multiple accounts by Dragonfly009. Note that User:The Extreme Sport Challenges who has previously also edited the article actually self-identified as Goodwin - this account has now been blocked. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC) AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - New user whose first edit is to comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Goodwin. Very suspicious. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Between the name, the same support, the similar tone, and editing the other account's comment with an indent, I've blocked the sock account. I've also left a warning for the master account. Mike V • Talk 01:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• Rosyangel121 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Oldcaged (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Helloradiant (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Mechanicinformal (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

All are recently created accounts that have edited the page Kieran Max Goodwin or Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kieran_Max_Goodwin (or a closely related page). They have all voted to keep the Goodwin page at AfD. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - All new accounts voting at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Max Goodwin. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

•  Confirmed Rosyangel121 (talk · contribs), Helloradiant (talk · contribs) and Mechanicinformal (talk · contribs) belong to Oldcaged (talk · contribs). - Mailer Diablo 03:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rosyangel121 is the oldest account.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. Blocked the master for one month and indeffed the socks. Closing. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• Rosyangel121 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

I merged two cases (Dragonfly009 and Rosyangel121) based on behavior, but now I realize that I am not totally sure that they are the same. They both voted to keep the page Kieran Max Goodwin created by Dragonfly009, and both already engaged in sockpuppetry. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - endorsing my own request. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Rosyangel121 is  Confirmed along with Fanaticalglobe (talk · contribs), Biotiteegg (talk · contribs), and Hellofromtheotherside1 (talk · contribs) (in addition to those already noted by Mailor Diablo in the archive). --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Dragonfly009, Rosyangel121, Fanaticalglobe, Biotiteegg, and Hellofromtheotherside1 have all been tagged and blocked indef per CU evidence. Closing case for now. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• Oldfriend (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Satnder63 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Collectionsocial (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Dragonfly009 focuses on promoting the teenager Kieran Goodwin. The three new accounts are recreating page on World Youth Organization now World Youth Organization (England), first created by Dragonfly009 [2] -- a local charity founded by Kieran Goodwin

• Collectionsocial vandalizes other page on WYO [3] (because founder of org is wrong), then vandalizes and edit wars to promote Goodwin's charity [4], [5], [6]
• after Collectionsocial is blocked, Satnder63 account is created and duplicates same WYO page in draft space [7]
• inactive Oldfriend account makes same edit war as Collectionsocial [8], then copypastes word-for-word WYO article in mainspace [9]

Oldfriend may be a meat puppet account. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Collectionsocial is  Confirmed, blocked, and tagged.
• The other two accounts are  Unrelated to each other and to the master. However, they are both using proxy servers (different ones), which makes location impossible to determine. That said, the other technical details also don't match the master's.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing the case. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]