Janitor102 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Sinkplil (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Picklespitlizyr (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Urbanuntil (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I am starting this over again, as I let myself get overwhelmed on the other attempt to request an investigation. You will note that User:Urbanuntil was blocked many years ago as a sockpuppet of User:Waldemar15. Editors believed it would be too hard to show that Sinkplil maybe a sock of Waldermar15, since that user was blocked so many years ago, so, I'm starting a bit fresh here. You will also notice that Janitor102 was also previously blocked. I believe that User:Janitor102 and User:Waldermar15 are related, but, that's up to you to sort out if you wish to go the extra mile.

Please bear with me and assume good faith.

• All of these accounts have a rich history of editing Mexican-related articles. For example, Janitor, Picklespitlizyr ("Pickle" for short) and Sinkplil have all extensively edited about Mexico City as noted in this in the Editor Interaction Analyser report. Heck, even our old friend User:Waldemar15 edited the Mexico City article.[1] Other examples of articles all of these editors have in Common include Puebla_(city)[2], Cancun and others.

• I came into contact with these accounts when I was working on Commons and received a message on my talk page from Urbanuntil about a caption I had written on the Immigration policy of Donald Trump article. You can see their comment on my Commons talk page here. The user asked how I knew they were Mexican immigrants. I thought that was random, so I checked out my watchlist and noticed that Sinkplil had removed an image and left a rather snarky edit rationale in doing so, visible here. I then introduced a rather poorly executed request for a sock investigation and Sink proceeded to leave a comment on the original investigation page here. They also moved to Commons and left a comment on my talk page here. Seems a little coincidential that Urbanuntil and Sink were both asking me about the caption in the Trump article, right?

Now, let's take a look at how Sink and these other editors contribute content.

• Sink and Pickle all make similar edit summaries, examples:

• Pickle: "what a bias!!!"[3]
• Sink: "Latinoe, desista de su proceder!!!"[4]

• Sink and Pickle often edit image details, examples:

• Torreón

Pickle's changes

Sink's changes

Janitor: ???[5]

• All three tend to move pages around based on what they believe is the most appropriate title or name of the subject

Janitor moves Museum of Mexico City[6]

Sink moves George Floyd Justice in Policing Act[7]

Pickle moves Mexico City administrative buildings[8]

• Clear concern for bias edits:

Janitor: "biased and truly unintelligibly caption"[9]

Pickle: "bunch of biased users. please, stop bias article"[10]

Sink: "removing images by ""knwoer user "Black Lives Matter" "User:Missvain")"[11]

I'm sure there is more, but, I really don't want to spend more time dealing with this than I have already. Note, Sink was blocked for harassing me in retaliation for my original request for investigation. Thanks everyone. Missvain (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC) Missvain (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - Please, compare Sinkplil to Picklespitlizyr. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Sinkplil is  Confirmed to the Janitor102 socks, Picklespitlizyr and Vesppuccino. A7572327 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is technically  Possible.  Blocked and tagged Sinkplil. For consideration, Waldemar15's 2013-2015 location is in a neighboring (non-US) state to these socks who are editing approximately 380 miles from the original location.
   — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and thanks for the update. I was clearly having a bad case of "down the possible sock rabbit hole" last night! Missvain (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Not enough behavioral evidence to connect A7..., so I'm going to leave them be for now. Everyone is already  Blocked and tagged, closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• ‎A7572327 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This is concerning the account A7572327. On 5/31/20, the account was created and it sat dormant until making 10-11 small edits. After reviewing these edit, I found them to be non-constructive or non-sense. I reverted Sinkplil's edits after they were blocked, which is allowed under WP:BP, because the block was in effect on the puppetmaster's account when these edits were made. Just days after that block of Sinkplil, the user A7572327 reinstated Sinkplil's edits over multiple Mexico related articles. They left me a talk page message alleging xenophobia/racism Special:Diff/972878200 here. It appears to be a calculated method of letting an account rest over 30 days, then making 10 non-sense or superficial edits to get the auto-confirmed status in order to proceed with pushing their perspectives. The pattern of edits suggest it's an agenda pushing sock account. Graywalls (talk) 09:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Graywalls, you need to remove Sinkplil from your list of "Suspected sockpuppets". That account had already been confirmed and blocked as a sockpuppet of Janitor102 three days before you filed this SPI. Therefore your list of "Suspected sockpuppets" should only include A7572327. You can mention and compare Sinkplil (as a previously confirmed sockpuppet) in your evidence, but remove them from the "Suspected" list.

Also, you need to supply WP:DIFFs as evidence, as noted in the instructions for filing SPIs. Softlavender (talk) 13:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While extremely obvious with the explanation already given... here:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Graywalls&diff=prev&oldid=972878200
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mexico_City&diff=prev&oldid=972878207
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Puebla_(city)&diff=prev&oldid=972878148
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Canc%C3%BAn&diff=prev&oldid=972878141
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morelia&diff=prev&oldid=972878197

Graywalls (talk) 14:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Tbhotch from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waldemar15.

At the pages saying "Tag: Manual revert" A7 is reverting content that was previously added by Waldemar socks. I suggest to check user it as this account was created in May and evaded a recent CU. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 17:55, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Also compare harassment of 1 with 2.
• On a side note, can the reports of Janitor and Waldermar be merged? They are the same person and with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Urbanuntil 1, Waldemar et al. will now have 3 different SPIs for the same person. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 18:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•  Likely him and using an open proxy,  Blocked and tagged.
   — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Blocked and tagged. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• MALM1001 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I'm on my cellphone so I'll give my evidence below © Tbhotch^™ 05:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Confirmed sock Sinkpill makes this edit, Fisher reverts it and Malm restored it[12]. Suggesting check user just in case there are sleepers. © Tbhotch^™ 05:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Likely,  Blocked and tagged.
   — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Close as nothing left to do here. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Breastplate2 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

At Museo Soumaya I reverted User:Picklespitlizyr + Vesppuccino edits here. BP restored them here. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 06:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC) At Template:National Autonomous University of Mexico same vandalism[13] as Picklespitlizyr [14]. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 16:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Global lock(s) requested. Close. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• AloneTrojan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All, Chihuahua City (A with B, Quinta Gameros, Church of Santa Prisca de Taxco (C, Architecture of Mexico and Tlaxcala City have been edited by Janitor sockpuppets, but this revert of me reverting a confirmed sockpuppet confirms they are the same person. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Personal attacks based on geographical region: [A with B , C or D. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 07:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• For the record I'm creating a LTA page. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 07:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Note that Doug Weller reverted a sockpuppet of JkMastru here, and Janitor reverted Doug here. This SPI should be merged to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JkMastru. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 06:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•  Confirmed, blocked tagged (I came here through WP:AIV and thus am not monitoring this case). Materialscientist (talk) 08:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Global lock(s) requested Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing as nothing further to do here. Account is locked. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 15:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Eightbenny (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Picklespitlizyr (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The edit interaction pattern between Janitor102, Picklespitlizyr & Eightbenny shows overlaps in a number of articles despite low-edit history. Certainly not enough evidence. But the thing is the general disruptive behaviour filing retaliatory & nonsensical ANI reports by Eightbenny & the sock "Picklespitlizyr". Process: "I undid some edit somewhere"-"editor takes me to ANI because they claim that I am Spanish?:

• Picklespitlizyr: diff: "User from Spain is changing header with a strange text]; is likely to a "nicely situation" descriptive title header"
• Eightbenny diff: "User says that "It is the generic one not presuming gender" in "King of Spain" infobox label and erase some image climate of Spain and by some reason puts this text: "Undid revision 1010126176 by Eightbenny (talk) Discuss in the talk page.". User is likely from Spain. Please, revert that edits" Asqueladd (talk) 00:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

As proven at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Urbanuntil, Janitor102 et at. love to make ad hominem comments based on geographical areas: [15][16][17]. Also note that Mexican Spanish is protected against Janitor102. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 00:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - Borderline for me; both Eightbenny and the past Janitor socks appear to be people of Mexican origin with English issues and a thing for accusing people of being "Spanish" but I'm not convinced enough to block on behavior at this point. All known socks are stale, but is there anything in the CU log? GeneralNotability (talk) 19:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• @GeneralNotability: As you noted, past socks are stale, but I ran a check and comparing to CU logs, Eightbenny is on a range that was previously frequented by Janitor102, and we don't get a whole lot of editors on enwiki from that range either. Under these circumstances, it's hard to give a template CU signal, but if I had to I would say  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). Mz7 (talk) 09:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Thanks Mz7. That's enough for me,  Blocked and tagged. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Costamasma (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Removing speedy deletion templates on categories created by Eightbenny, see Category:Persecution of LGBT people in Mexico and Category:Discrimination against LGBT people in Mexico Pahunkat (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Blocked and tagged — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Pedro158 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Janiclett (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

OK, this is perhaps the most CSI-esque thing I'd ever say here but I think that these accounts are those of Janitor, aka Urbanuntil. Maybe they are too old for CU, but behavioral evidence is all I need and I'm sorry I can't keep this consice.

Let's start with Pedro. Like Urbanuntil/Janitor, the user is interested in Mexican-related topics. In fact, several of the pages that Pedro modified were already modified by Urban and their accounts.

• For example: in Phillippines, Picklespitlizyr edit-wars an image. Pedro edit-wars an image.
• Picklespitlizyr insults on geography, Pedro insults on geography.
• For other pages edited by them refer to [18].

But now, let's go with Janiclett (talk · contribs). Janiclett caught my attention here, "21th". Ok, that was weird, everyone makes mistakes, but Janiclett had been correcting other grammar mistakes everywhere, so that makes no sense. But then I remember Janitor and went to their edit's history and started seeing Mexican related pages, including those modified by the confirmed socks, including those edits by Pedro.

But what completely left me without doubts that Janiclett is at the very least Pedro is not found here. It is found at es.wiki. On the history of Rafael Ximeno y Planes, Eduardo reverts Pedro, Eduardo is then inexplicably reverted by the newly created Janiclett.

As I was writing this SPI, Janiclett inadvertently left this (21st and 21th) are the same thing. Urbanuntil gets offended when corrected [19][20]

And lastly, as I was writing this, Janiclett went crazy and started reverting my edits on Mexican-related topics, just like another sockpuppet.

Requesting a CU because there might exist sleepers. I highly recommend a global block as well. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These "similarities" are a joke. Please, I request a speedly closing of this "report" because this user is making reports by retaliation because I exhibit a less-aggresive behavior than this only purpose account, i.e., this guy quietly is studyng me by too time and uploaded the Very first "card"board" statue?, in Wikipedia because politics from Mexico.. --Janiclett (talk) 19:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then feel free to explain this. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

... Umm... impressive "evidences", homie?. That's so old, I complete forgot that day, sorry. --Janiclett (talk) 19:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now this guy is making offtopic by one million of another "sockpuppet" claims. Lol. --Janiclett (talk) 19:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you won't deny being a sockpuppet of Pedro, who is blocked from editing here. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I was going to wait for the result of the SPI, but Special:Diff/1050268565 crossed the line to harassment, and there is no reason to expect this to stop without a block. Checking for sleepers sounds good to me. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  In progress Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Pedro158 is  Stale. Janiclett is  Confirmed to Janitzius. Based on the CU log these accounts are  Possible to  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to Eightbenny. Leaving tagging up to a clerk or admin who is familiar with this case.  Global lock(s) requested. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it's worth it, I found an insult on nationality as well. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I tagged Janiclett with dual tag. Closing. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 187.171.44.114 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Special:Contributions/187.171.44.114 perfectly matches Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Urbanuntil. Zayul (talk) 02:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Urbanuntil is stayed. xd --187.171.44.114 (talk) 02:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't known "perfectly matches" lexicon phrase. --187.171.44.114 (talk) 02:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It means "is very similar" or "same". Zayul (talk) 02:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But you just stats "Special:Contributions/187.171.44.114 perfectly matches Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Urbanuntil." you mentioned another thing? --187.171.44.114 (talk) 02:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP blocked. Nothing more to do here except clerk business. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 03:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Jalapestra (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Latest known user: User:Janiclett. At Wikimedia Commons Jalapestra orders a barely active non-admin user to "take care of" me and my contributions. This is the third time the user ordered MM to perform admin actions on me.[21][22] A global block is required and a CU is needed as Urbanuntil tends to create multiple sockpuppets. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 00:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This online dictatorship would be sent to Russia, is the cancer of Internet and misinformation and the guilty is of liberal crybabies like these admins that obeys this obvious permaban-pardoned illegal. Jalapestra (talk) 23:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Harassment/Wikihounding and saying that things are "biased" [23][24][25] (CC) Tbhotch^™ 13:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Selected versions downgrade of Mexican articles or "related" made by "Tbhotch" by "block evasion"/"Long-terms abuses": [26], [27], obvious bias in that article about Mexico City Metro Line 12 accident created compulsively by this user, [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], Charles IV of Spain, Spanish well-known artist that worked much in colonial Mexico, National Palace (Mexico), restore of "Additionally, the goddess is one of the Pre-Columbian motifs found in California Chicano Literature" in Ītzpāpālōtl, [35], Talk:Manuel Tolsá, Tamarindo (drink), nosense message with the "estúpido" Spanish word placed in the editing resume because for user "Tbhotch", sounds like "being some secure" --Jalapestra (talk) 23:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recently new downgrades' targets by this user made after this request, in order: Cinema of Mexico, Jorge Negrete, Immaculate Conception Cathedral, Comayagua (possibly "LGBT victimism" Mexican downgrades' façade), Spanish America, Site of original mission and remaining ruins of La Purisima Mission (same as Comayagua Cathedral), List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area in excess of 1,000,000 square kilometers, Puerto Balandra, Baja California Sur, Mexican cuisine, user can made groups of 52 downgrades by new blocked users. Jalapestra (talk) 23:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Blocked and tagged,  Global lock(s) requested, closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]