I am starting this over again, as I let myself get overwhelmed on the other attempt to request an investigation. You will note that User:Urbanuntil was blocked many years ago as a sockpuppet of User:Waldemar15. Editors believed it would be too hard to show that Sinkplil maybe a sock of Waldermar15, since that user was blocked so many years ago, so, I'm starting a bit fresh here. You will also notice that Janitor102 was also previously blocked. I believe that User:Janitor102 and User:Waldermar15 are related, but, that's up to you to sort out if you wish to go the extra mile.
Please bear with me and assume good faith.
Now, let's take a look at how Sink and these other editors contribute content.
I'm sure there is more, but, I really don't want to spend more time dealing with this than I have already. Note, Sink was blocked for harassing me in retaliation for my original request for investigation. Thanks everyone. Missvain (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC) Missvain (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This is concerning the account A7572327. On 5/31/20, the account was created and it sat dormant until making 10-11 small edits. After reviewing these edit, I found them to be non-constructive or non-sense. I reverted Sinkplil's edits after they were blocked, which is allowed under WP:BP, because the block was in effect on the puppetmaster's account when these edits were made. Just days after that block of Sinkplil, the user A7572327 reinstated Sinkplil's edits over multiple Mexico related articles. They left me a talk page message alleging xenophobia/racism Special:Diff/972878200 here. It appears to be a calculated method of letting an account rest over 30 days, then making 10 non-sense or superficial edits to get the auto-confirmed status in order to proceed with pushing their perspectives. The pattern of edits suggest it's an agenda pushing sock account. Graywalls (talk) 09:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Graywalls, you need to remove Sinkplil from your list of "Suspected sockpuppets". That account had already been confirmed and blocked as a sockpuppet of Janitor102 three days before you filed this SPI. Therefore your list of "Suspected sockpuppets" should only include A7572327. You can mention and compare Sinkplil (as a previously confirmed sockpuppet) in your evidence, but remove them from the "Suspected" list.
Also, you need to supply WP:DIFFs as evidence, as noted in the instructions for filing SPIs. Softlavender (talk) 13:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
At the pages saying "Tag: Manual revert" A7 is reverting content that was previously added by Waldemar socks. I suggest to check user it as this account was created in May and evaded a recent CU. © Tbhotch™ (en-3). 17:55, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
I'm on my cellphone so I'll give my evidence below © Tbhotch™ 05:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
At Museo Soumaya I reverted User:Picklespitlizyr + Vesppuccino edits here. BP restored them here. (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC) At Template:National Autonomous University of Mexico same vandalism[13] as Picklespitlizyr [14]. (CC) Tbhotch™ 16:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
All, Chihuahua City (A with B, Quinta Gameros, Church of Santa Prisca de Taxco (C, Architecture of Mexico and Tlaxcala City have been edited by Janitor sockpuppets, but this revert of me reverting a confirmed sockpuppet confirms they are the same person. (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Note that Doug Weller reverted a sockpuppet of JkMastru here, and Janitor reverted Doug here. This SPI should be merged to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JkMastru. (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
The edit interaction pattern between Janitor102, Picklespitlizyr & Eightbenny shows overlaps in a number of articles despite low-edit history. Certainly not enough evidence. But the thing is the general disruptive behaviour filing retaliatory & nonsensical ANI reports by Eightbenny & the sock "Picklespitlizyr". Process: "I undid some edit somewhere"-"editor takes me to ANI because they claim that I am Spanish?:
"User from Spain is changing header with a strange text]; is likely to a "nicely situation" descriptive title header"
"User says that "It is the generic one not presuming gender" in "King of Spain" infobox label and erase some image climate of Spain and by some reason puts this text: "Undid revision 1010126176 by Eightbenny (talk) Discuss in the talk page.". User is likely from Spain. Please, revert that edits"Asqueladd (talk) 00:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
As proven at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Urbanuntil, Janitor102 et at. love to make ad hominem comments based on geographical areas: [15][16][17]. Also note that Mexican Spanish is protected against Janitor102. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Removing speedy deletion templates on categories created by Eightbenny, see Category:Persecution of LGBT people in Mexico and Category:Discrimination against LGBT people in Mexico Pahunkat (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
OK, this is perhaps the most CSI-esque thing I'd ever say here but I think that these accounts are those of Janitor, aka Urbanuntil. Maybe they are too old for CU, but behavioral evidence is all I need and I'm sorry I can't keep this consice.
Let's start with Pedro. Like Urbanuntil/Janitor, the user is interested in Mexican-related topics. In fact, several of the pages that Pedro modified were already modified by Urban and their accounts.
But now, let's go with Janiclett (talk · contribs). Janiclett caught my attention here, "21th". Ok, that was weird, everyone makes mistakes, but Janiclett had been correcting other grammar mistakes everywhere, so that makes no sense. But then I remember Janitor and went to their edit's history and started seeing Mexican related pages, including those modified by the confirmed socks, including those edits by Pedro.
But what completely left me without doubts that Janiclett is at the very least Pedro is not found here. It is found at es.wiki. On the history of Rafael Ximeno y Planes, Eduardo reverts Pedro, Eduardo is then inexplicably reverted by the newly created Janiclett.
As I was writing this SPI, Janiclett inadvertently left this (21st and 21th) are the same thing. Urbanuntil gets offended when corrected [19][20]
And lastly, as I was writing this, Janiclett went crazy and started reverting my edits on Mexican-related topics, just like another sockpuppet.
Requesting a CU because there might exist sleepers. I highly recommend a global block as well. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
These "similarities" are a joke. Please, I request a speedly closing of this "report" because this user is making reports by retaliation because I exhibit a less-aggresive behavior than this only purpose account, i.e., this guy quietly is studyng me by too time and uploaded the Very first "card"board" statue?, in Wikipedia because politics from Mexico.. --Janiclett (talk) 19:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/187.171.44.114 perfectly matches Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Urbanuntil. Zayul (talk) 02:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Urbanuntil is stayed. xd --187.171.44.114 (talk) 02:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
IP blocked. Nothing more to do here except clerk business. -- zzuuzz (talk) 03:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Latest known user: User:Janiclett. At Wikimedia Commons Jalapestra orders a barely active non-admin user to "take care of" me and my contributions. This is the third time the user ordered MM to perform admin actions on me.[21][22] A global block is required and a CU is needed as Urbanuntil tends to create multiple sockpuppets. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)