User:Jojojohnson2

[edit]
Jojojohnson2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Jojojohnson2

Jojojohnson2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date March 28 2009, 01:25 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)


contributions include identical actions and very similar summaries to LouPepe (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)'s and Sgt dizzle guy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)'s. Same style of one-sentence user page and talk page. Same fixation on the BJCP.

User has removed sock notification.

Killing Vector (talk) 01:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Report date March 30 2009, 20:27 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)


contributions and pattern of harassment match User:Jojojohnson2, User:sgt dizzle guy, and related cases.

RoyalIvey's contributions add links to the BJCP to beer style articles and suppress links to websites maintained by User:Patto1ro and others: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Jojojohnson's do the same: [6] [7] [8]

This is an elaboration of the pattern from [[User:Miklebe], who was blocked for spamming and impersonation: [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] --Killing Vector (talk) 09:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Done. --Killing Vector (talk) 09:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Blocked the sock indef, please tag and archive. —— nixeagleemail me 06:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving. Foxy Loxy Pounce! 06:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Report date April 7 2009, 23:26 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)


Identical spamming of beer style articles with links to the BJCP style guide:

Harrassing User:Patto1ro

See also Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse#User:Newcrewforu

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: A + B (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion and ongoing serious pattern vandalism)
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by Killing Vector (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 23:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Conclusions



Report date April 10 2009, 08:26 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Killing Vector (talk) 08:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)



Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date April 12 2009, 09:03 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)


Both users are spamming the BJCP link.

Both users started editing after Jojojohnson's most recent sock was blocked on the 10th. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jojojohnson2/Archive#Report_date_April_10_2009.2C_08:26_.28UTC.29

Yosheko uses the "do not revert" edit summary, as previous socks have. [34] [35] Killing Vector (talk) 09:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roscoejankins was created just after the above was filed and has made two edits: the BJCP clause and an entry on User:Patto1ro's page. [36] [37]

Oh, another one. Brazzersbrazzers spams the BJCP link [38] [39] and tries to go after me an Patto1ro in their edits [40]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Evidence checks out Valley2city‽ 06:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Indef blocks all around. Clerk please add to archive. Valley2city‽ 06:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date April 15 2009, 23:14 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Same as before: spamming of BJCP link. deleting Patto1ro's sites. [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] Killing Vector (talk) 23:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)



Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. - Can we have a checkuser look into this user and identify any sleepers and see about blocking the underlaying IP/Ranges please? This is getting silly. (See the archives for evidence of persistant socking). —— nixeagleemail me 01:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date May 26 2009, 01:31 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Same as before: linkspamming & reverting User:Patto1ro and User:Mikebe. [46] [47]

Jojojohnson2 diffs: [48] [49] [50]

Killing Vector (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Killing Vector (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]


Previous socks have had a checkuser and IP block applied. Puppetmaster has used sleepers before. --Killing Vector (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk endorsed This is a DUCK case, but we should see about blocking the underlying IP/range. — Jake Wartenberg 02:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

CU says range too big; ain't gonna happen. — Jake Wartenberg 02:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Report date May 26 2009, 03:40 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Same BJCP link spamming. Yes, an SPI case from this puppetmaster was closed like ten minutes ago. [51] [52] [53]

Jojojohnson2 diffs: [54] [55] [56]

Killing Vector (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
Indeffed - obvious sock. J.delanoygabsadds 03:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Report date May 30 2009, 09:16 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Same blanking of links on Beer style. New user using undo feature. [57]

Previous sock User:shoelessjoeboy: [58]

Killing Vector (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Blocked and tagged. Looking at the archive, it appears the IP range is too big for a block. Oh well. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date July 1 2009, 17:44 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets



Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

Newcrewforu MO, for reference: Wikipedia:LTA#User:Newcrewforu

Killing Vector (talk) 17:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Blocked and tagged. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date July 7 2009, 02:00 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

Newcrewforu MO, for reference: Wikipedia:LTA#User:Newcrewforu

--Killing Vector (talk) 02:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Blocked/tagged. I'm sorry to say that, looking at the archive, the range is far too large to block. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date July 8 2009, 14:57 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

Part of the same wave of attacks as here.

I have now filed literally dozens of these SPI reports against the Jojojohnson2/newcrewforu user. Is there anything else that can be done? --Killing Vector (talk) 14:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can request a CheckUser to see if an IP block or range block would be possible. I have done so below. Tiptoety talk 15:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Request for CheckUser
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Tiptoety talk 15:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date July 10 2009, 00:39 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


Same BJCP spamming as previous socks. [71] [72].

Same harrassment of User:Patto1ro and User:Mikebe: [73]

Newcrewforu/Jojojohnson2 editor MO: Wikipedia:LTA#User:Newcrewforu

--Killing Vector (talk) 00:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date July 15 2009, 13:53 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

All user contributions fit the usual linkspamming-reverting pattern, on the usual batch of articles.

This user: Special:Contributions/KeepTheBJCP

Newcrewforu/Jojojohnson2 editor MO: Wikipedia:LTA#User:Newcrewforu

--Killing Vector (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date August 2 2009, 23:24 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets



Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

Same BJCP spamming as previous socks. [74] [75]

Newcrewforu/Jojojohnson2 editor MO: Wikipedia:LTA#User:Newcrewforu

--Killing Vector (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Blocked/tagged. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date August 21 2009, 14:40 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


Contribs and content of user pages the same as in previous Jojojohnson2 socks.

Never mind, already blocked by User:Gogo Dodo. --Killing Vector (talk) 14:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Killing Vector (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date October 23 2009, 18:58 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]
Evidence submitted by Gogo Dodo
[edit]

I'm not entirely sure whose sockpuppet this is. The edit of reinserting bjcp.org link [76] makes me think this is a potential Jojojohnson2 sockpuppet. The undoing on Continuation War shows as on obvious sockpuppet of War began with Soviet offensive (talk · contribs). The total editor history shows a pattern of undoing recent edits by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) who is active in dealing with Jojojohnson2 sockpuppets. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Soviet Offensive user *might* be Jojojohnson2, but I think it's more likely that it's a return of the Kven user who's been stalking Continuation War and other Finland-related pages for years. --Killing Vector (talk) 20:32, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by accused parties   
[edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
[edit]
CheckUser requests
[edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC) [reply]



Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]
Conclusions
[edit]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date November 10 2009, 23:49 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]


Evidence submitted by Killing Vector
[edit]

Same BJCP spamming [77] as previous stops [78] Killing Vector (talk) 23:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Comments by accused parties
[edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
[edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]
Conclusions
[edit]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date December 2 2009, 04:56 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]


Evidence submitted by Crossmr
[edit]

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Hoodatdat.2C_Ownership_and_edit_warring Hoodatdat was blocked as a sockpuppet for reverting to the same versions by other puppets on pages. With that in mind it might be prudent to make sure they're related and if there are any other accounts there now.Crossmr (talk) 04:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties   
[edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
[edit]
CheckUser requests
[edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: B  + D (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and 3RR using socks)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Crossmr (talk) 04:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]

 Confirmed Jojojohnson2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) =

All of these are already blocked. J.delanoygabsadds 19:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Conclusions
[edit]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Report date December 18 2009, 18:07 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]
Evidence submitted by Ronz
[edit]

RoodneyKang's edit warring in Beef phanaeng ([79] [80] [81]) is a continuation an edit-war by Vector by ([82] [83] [84] [85]) over the same external link.

RoodneyKang's edit warring in David Stern ([86] [87] [88]) is over information originally added by Vector by [89] . --Ronz (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RoodneyKang has edited only two other articles, David Glick and Rohrbach Brewing Company, fitting the pattern of Vector by and other Jojojohnson2 socks of editing articles about breweries and Jewish BLPs. --Ronz (talk) 00:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties
[edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
[edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]
Conclusions
[edit]

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. MuZemike 01:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Report date January 21 2010, 10:35 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]


Evidence submitted by MER-C
[edit]

It looks like our old friend has taken up spamdexing for a living. See WikiProject Spam report. Short story: all listed accounts above spammed

sabmileer.in: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

plus a CU confirmed sock. Can we get year-long blocks on the IPs and a sleeper check please? Nothing but spam there. MER-C 10:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties
[edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
[edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by MER-C 10:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Clerk endorsed Tim Song (talk) 11:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It may be someone else; at least, the IPs are in India this time. In any case  Confirmed all the listed accounts and IPs match, plus GodhaR. The IPs are safe to block long-term. Dominic·t 07:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: All accounts tagged, including the IPs. –MuZemike 19:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.
09 January 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


This user is the latest of a series of sockpuppets that vandalise my edits. Look at his edits and you'll see that they are almost all reverts of my edits. He has used dozens of user names in the past to attack my contributions. Patto1ro (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
11 January 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Yet another sock puppet of Jojojohnson2 adding BJCP link spam. Patto1ro (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

magic eight ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says:  Confirmed,  IP blocked, no obvious sleepers. T. Canens (talk) 14:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

16 June 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Strongly suspect this is another sock puppet of Jojojohnson2. Repeated Jojojounson2's previous vandalism of the Manischewitz page, and when I reverted, went around to other unrelated pages reverting my own earlier edits. MadPoster (talk) 15:26, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

30 June 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


MadPoster (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
More