Lala migos (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Atlaslion1912 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 31.21.157.14 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

They are edit warring on the same articles using the same edit summaries.

• North Africa: [1][2][3]

Lala migos and the IP used the same edit summary: Not all the North african countries are called Maghreb.

• Moroccan cuisine: [4][5][6]

All three used the exact same edit summary: No source.

• Imad Hadar: All three of them edited this article which was created by "Atlaslion1912" on the 2nd of January. M.Bitton (talk) 15:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further examination, it appears that GiantSnowman has already established that the IP belongs to "Atlaslion1912". M.Bitton (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Note: I've gone ahead and deleted that IP's user page. GiantSnowman added ((sock|Atlaslion1912|confirmed)) on the basis of this diff, where Atlaslion1912 acknowledged that 31.21.157.14 was their IP. Unfortunately, this particular template syntax has the effect of claiming that a CheckUser has verified that this IP does belong to Atlaslion1912; however, CheckUser cannot be used to link IPs and accounts per the privacy policy. If we wish, we can instead use ((IPsock)) on the IP's talk page. Mz7 (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• The link between Atlaslion1912 and the IP is admitted, see this. GiantSnowman 19:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • See also file on the Dutch Wikipedia. --Daniuu (talk) 21:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing—please see #23 January 2021 below. Mz7 (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Atlaslion1912 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Hozmaster (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Atlass Lion (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 31.21.157.14 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 83.137.2.204 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Lala Migos has been blocked on nl-wiki for abusing multiple accounts to make dubious edits on Morocco-related topics. A fellow user alerted me on my talk page that this user became active here. It was reported that he started doing similar edits, like here on Bard Hari (a page that was previously vandalized on nl-wiki too). The username of Atlaslion1912 matches with the names of other socks and passes a duck test (like here). The third account also shows similar intrests, as are the IP's. Requesting CU to check whether accounts can be connected and eventual sleepers are present. Daniuu (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Remark: I didn't spot the previous request for an investigation.  Global lock(s) requested for the previous socks that were active on the Dutch Wikipedia. --Daniuu (talk) 21:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Atlaslion1912 and Hozmaster are  Confirmed to Lala migos.  Blocked and tagged. Atlass Lion is  Stale.  No comment with respect to IP address(es) from a CU standpoint, but because Atlaslion1912 has acknowledged that 31.21.157.14 is their IP, I will be blocking it as well. I don't think there's any need to deal with the stale accounts and IPs that haven't edited in several weeks; if they return to activity, then they can be re-reported. Global locks have already been requested. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Ucfberrada (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

From what I can tell, Lala migos is a pro-Moroccan sock operator.

• At Talk:Nora Fatehi, Ucfberrada engaged in a prolonged discussion arguing that Fatehi should be described as "Moroccan-Canadian" in the intro sentence of the lede, based on their understanding of Moroccan law, which bestows citizenship to children of Moroccan citizens by default. The user felt so strongly about it, that they eventually got blocked for a week after lobbing personal attacks in the form of accusations of racism.
• Atlaslion1912 was one of the more recent Lala migos socks to be CU blocked. Here we see them arguing that some sports figure should be described as French-Moroccan.
• In this edit on GiantSnowman's talk page, Atlaslion1912 admits to editing while logged-out, from 31.21.157.14 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (Netherlands) Looking at their contributions, we find this edit at Nora Fatehi, where the editor wants her to be described as Moroccan-Canadian based on the laws of Morocco.
• On the Nora Fatehi talk page, Ucfberrada mentioned that Emmanuelle Chriqui was an example of someone else who should be listed as Moroccan-Canadian. The IP editor has also edited that article about four times.

Anyhow, this isn't a slam-dunk, so I'm hoping a CU can see whether there's any merit here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Unrelated as far as checkuser evidence goes... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• This case is being reviewed by Blablubbs as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
  I'm not sufficiently convinced by behaviour to overrule an ((unrelated)) result. Closing with no action. Blablubbs|talk 23:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 85.148.129.62 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) ( Clerk note: original case name)
• Hambra1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both users have been making essentially the same kind of edits (the IP seems to be older than the named account, so I've listed that as sockmaster). They react and write in similar ways on user talk pages (e.g. here, here, and here), although some of that resemblance could be chalked up to anger and non-native English skills. More to the point, there are occasions where both accounts use suspiciously identical or partly identical wording for edit summaries. For example: Hambra1 made multiple edits with the summary "legitimate edit that was unfairly rolled back" on March 9 (see their history that day), while 85.148.129.62 did the same thing for one edit here on the same day. Elsewhere, 85.148.129.62 made two edits (here and here) with summaries accusing previous reverts of being "by a pan Arabist" (an ideological term, but an odd one for two independent users to use at the same time), while Hambra1 did the same here on one of the same pages the next day.

I'm not confidant about the connection, but there's also resemblance to this previous case. Maybe M.Bitton or Drmies can say whether that connection looks likely or not. I also haven't requested a CheckUser before, but since it seems plausible that it's a case of WP:MEATPUPPET instead (with two people following closely each other's examples), this seemed like the only way to sort it out. That said, if it seems unnecessary that's fine too.

To be clear, I think this user (if it is the same user) is trying to make a legitimate contribution to Wikipedia, and 85.148.129.62's latest edits (on March 17) are finally starting to look like what such edits should look like, so it would be a shame. If they are sockpuppets, 85.148.129.62's allusion here to "multiple users who have already noticed and complained about this" (unclear who they could mean other than Hambra1) would suggest that they are consciously trying to exploit multiple accounts to create support. R Prazeres (talk) 00:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Dear CU clerk, move the whole lot to the Lala migos SPI. Hambra1 is CU-confirmed with Lala, and Atlaslion, and Hozmaster. What a shame. Drmies (talk) 01:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can't merge this myself (I think? I still don't fully understand histmerges), but the sock is now tagged and  Global lock(s) requested. Blablubbs|talk 01:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Moved, IP blocked 1wk, closing, Cabayi (talk) 07:48, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 94.157.235.223 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Similar pattern of edits on Moroccan/Atlas/Berber-related topics. IP with high cross-wiki activity. The IP has more edits on nlwiki, where this intersection seems to be more than a weird coincidence (almost all pages IP edited on nlwiki were previously visited by other Lala migos socks). Daniuu (talk) 18:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• IP edits are too old, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]