Maqs1231 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Rongraphicjames (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

As pointed out by @Nihonjoe: at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nettech Ltd, a walled garden of very similar articles on non-notable companies has been created -- and this editor's sole creation Sunwest Solutions matches Nettech Ltd. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Technically indistinguishable - one has been editing from a webhost, but the user agents and behavior match. Blocked and tagged, closing. Katie^talk 16:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Kevinsmith9238 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Soomromoid (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

User:Kevinsmith9238 created Sunwest Solutions with a similar pattern of dubious references to those used by the previously blocked User talk:Jonesandrew848 on Nettech Ltd: a claim to notability sourced to a Yellow Pages listing that does not support the claim, another reference linking to the Design Museum website which does not mention the firm or support the claim. User:Soomromoid, another new account, has an editing pattern [1] of operating on the articles created by the existing blocked sock and the Kevinsmith9238 account. AllyD (talk) 13:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Confirmed, blocked, and tagged. Closing. Katie^talk 15:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Chrisangel123 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Already blocked by Nihonjoe as a sock of Maqs1231 but not added to the SPI case record archives and so categorized. Could we please do so? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I didn't know if I could add ((sockpuppet|1=Maqs1231|2=confirmed)) myself, as a non-admin. Apparently I can. Now that I've created a record here through the pending closure, I think we're done. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Account blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 17:09, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]