Nevandc98 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• 71.38.66.237 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same edits to Sonny with a Chance. 117Avenue (talk) 22:39, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

 Administrator note Nevandc98 reblocked with an extended block to 1 week for continued edit warring through block evasion. The IP was autoblocked, but I upgraded the block to 1 week as well. Elockid ^(Talk) 22:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Make that two weeks. Didn't realize that the 1st block concerning this issue was a week, not three days. Elockid ^(Talk) 22:56, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• Dcupdates11 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

The user pages of both editors indicates they are the same person and this edit at Talk:Disney Channel pretty much confirms it.

Nevandc98 was blocked on 3 May 2011 for 2 weeks for sockpupetry.[1] Only five days later, Dcupdates11 was created, clearly in an effort to evade the block. Two weeks ago I reported Dcupdates11 at ANI for editing disruptively. (archived discussion) Before the discussion progressed, Dcupdates11 breached 3RR at So Random! and was blocked for 24 hours.(SPI report) After that block expired he continued to edit war and was then blocked for 3 more days.[2] Since the block has expired he has continued editing disruptively, although in a less aggressive manner, most notably at Disney Channel. Today I noticed the edit on the talk page and, after looking at the user pages of both users, realised they were the same person. AussieLegend (talk) 07:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Blocked and tagged.—Kww(talk) 13:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• Dcfacts2011 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Similar name to the last sock (Dcupdates11), from the same place (Fullerton, Nebraska), same interests (Disney Channel), same attitude towards Disney Channel (knows everything), same template on the userpage (((User Wikipedian for))), same facebook page, wears the same spectacles on the same face. Is there any doubt? AussieLegend (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Blocked, tagged, reverted.—Kww(talk) 05:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• DisneyReady (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

DisneyReady already blocked per WP:DUCK. Time to see if there's an IP block that would be effective, as he doesn't seem to be letting up. —Kww(talk) 11:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk endorsed - This is the third report this month. We need to look at options here for an IP block, due to disruption, or at least to do a thorough sift through their sock drawer. Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 11:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed. The range though, is a /13, so a rangeblock is out. TNXMan 13:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• That's a real shame. Tagged as confirmed sock, not much else we can do here. Closing Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 13:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]