Newspaperwriter10021 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Vschwaid (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Spinoloricus (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Spinoloricus is not a sockpuppet. I do not know who Newspaperwriter10021 is. Spinoloricus (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And another WP:DUCK case. The above users have all came to the rescue of An AFD case and two have few or no other contributions other than to the AFD. Dusti^*poke* 04:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a "sockpuppet".

•  Clerk endorsed - Sure, a look to help clarify if this is meat or socking would be good. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • CU on User:Vschwaid is  Possible, on User:Spinoloricus is  Likely, nothing here to refute the behavioral evidence. Jclemens (talk) 07:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Administrator note I've blocked Spinoloricus as a sock and warned the master. As to Vschwaid, the account hasn't edited in awhile and I'm thinking it may be some form of meatpuppeting, so I'm leaving it alone for now. Feel free to relist if anything new happens. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 23:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]