Thewikiuser1999

Thewikiuser1999 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

17 October 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20 January 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Just noting for the record that there is a potential connection between this sockmaster and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Indo12122, based on overlap at Chandragupta II's Campaign of Balkh. Recently blocked Indo sock Guchhemane556 recently restored content added in December by TWU1999 sock Agniveer099. Agniveer099 was in turn restoring content from Indo sock Magadhan3933. That's as far into the chain as I delved. CU evidence suggested a possible link, but was inconclusive. Dropping this note here in case further connections pop up in the future. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Closing. This is just a note for the future. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

28 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

There is no doubt in my mind that Sudsahab is a sock of our master (and it seems that User:PadFoot2008 thinks so too); they are CU-confirmed with Krishna57edits, who was mentioned in an earlier report. I've blocked them but I don't have CU info on the earlier instances; the clerk can certainly mark them as CU-confirmed with each other, adapt my block, or note it in the log. Drmies (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Drmies (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

More