Writer media

Writer media (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
20 July 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

they make same to same changes in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ashok_Chauhan&offset=&limit=500&action=history. They delete controversy even tho it is supported by reliable sources. They say the same thing in edit summary when deleting the controversy section. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ashok_Chauhan&diff=prev&oldid=615136417 and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ashok_Chauhan&diff=prev&oldid=610770353. 101.59.172.76 (talk) 07:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Clerk endorsed The edit summary is the most obvious linkage, but it could be that one just copied the other. In addition, I'm seeing some overlap with Arifhasan23 (talk · contribs · count) (lots of suspected puppets but apparently no SPI) that I'd like to sort out.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, Rich, I should have provided diffs. User:Sultanakan, a puppet of Arifhasan23, created the now-deleted article AReputation. As you can see from its history, Art2edit recreated it. A whole bunch of CU-blocked accounts were involved in the article Relief India Trust, which Art2edit also edited. I have no idea who those blocked accounts relate to, though, as they're not tagged. Finally, Kapilaa edited the article Lavasa several times. Sultanakan also edited the article twice (here and here). So, part of my inquiry is whether there's a relationship with the other master, and part of it is whether there's anything at all. Certainly, in my view, there is not enough to block based on behavior alone. Even with what I've just written, I'm not sure there's enough to justify a CU. It's a close call, and that's why you get paid the big bucks. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 22:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
After looking at the articles you listed, and the associated users, I just don't see enough of a probable connection to justify a CU check. I'll wait a day or so before marking the CU request as declined, just in case some other CU disagrees with me. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Writer media is the oldest account listed, so they are now the master. I've indeffed all the accounts that were not already indeffed, and I've tagged everyone. Thanks for all the work.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]