The result of the debate was keep
From WP:WSS/D. 41 articles. There's a better discussion on /D that I don't need to repeat here. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep
From WP:WSS/D. A bit small at 24 articles, but there is a Portal:Creationism. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep
From WP:WSS/D. We don't usually like to split people by state because they move around too much. However, this does have slightly over 60 articles. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was variously delete and clean up per nomination
From WP:WSS/D. All associated with Wikipedia:WikiProject Cocktails
The end result (ideally) should be: ((cocktail-stub)) feeding into Cat:Cocktail stubs. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was listed at WP:TFD
From WP:WSS/D. I'm not 100% positive this should be here (as opposed to WP:MFD), but these Sailor Moon-specific templates are acting like ((sectstub)) and ((listdev)). -stub-section is used on 4 articles and feeds into Cat:Sailor Moon stubs. -stub-List is used on 3 articles. Delete this nonsense and use ((sectstub)) and ((listdev)) instead. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Never proposed, badly formatted (no category, to start with), only one stub (a programme stub)... and this is not how we split tv stubs! Delete Grutness...wha? 06:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Never proposed, only one stub, and - judging by what's written under domotics - that stub doesn't actually relate to domotics in any way. Not likely to reach 60 any time soon (i.e., not in the next couple of years). Delete. Grutness...wha? 06:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]