The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Rhode Island Hero (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <blocked indef last Nov>

Suspected sockpuppets

70.181.24.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <48 hrs for continuing vandalism>

Greg Jungwirth (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <indef from RFCU>

Additional accounts after initial submission:

67.93.25.195 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <"colective", no edits for several days, tagged>

72.200.176.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <"colective", already blocked 24 hours, tagged>

The C. Leader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <indef from RFCU>

24.250.38.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <"colective", already blocked 2 weeks as a Crips r us sock, tagged>

Pokemega32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) (suspected to be connected due to alleged stolen account) <doesn't edit for 5 1/2 months and comes straight to this SSP case? Highly suspicious, but see nothing blockable, tagged as suspected sock>

ThegreatWakkorati (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) confirmed as unrelated

LDEJRuff (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <no action, not convinced of this one>

70.253.93.103's vengance (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <indef username vio, implies disruptive intent>

I.P. 70.253.93.103's vengance (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <indef username vio, implies disruptive intent>

70.253.93.103's vengance2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <indef username vio, implies disruptive intent>

3151253209225 leader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <indef from RFCU>

70.253.93.103 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) <already had a temp block, no recent acty, but tagged as sock>

Report submission by

treelo _talk 02:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Has edited user talkpages who have dealt with his sockpuppets in the past and prior identities' userpages with aphorisms tagged with "Colective" at the end. [1] [2] [3] Greg Jungwirth seems to be the real identity of the sockpuppeteer as a prior CU case has shown [4] The IP address has been warned due to vandalising his own accounts as a double-bluff.

• Further evidence: Has recently blanked my usertalk page several times ([5] [6] [7]) and may want to consider the Greg Jungwirth account as the master account because of it predating the Rhode Island Hero account by a month. Also can be tied to User:Jungwirthwillkillallrocks given the Greg account tried to move their account to that username a few times [8]. treelo _talk 16:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Vandalism is ongoing via different usernames and IP addresses, might need something a bit more immediate to deal with this issue. According to a WHOIS check all IP addresses are coming from a single ISP based in Atlanta, GA. --treelo _talk 03:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Has recently added goading comments to talkpages[9] [10] and userpages of previous identities[11] indicating their connectedness to a spate of pageblanking with associated accounts in an attempt to make those who have dealt with his vandalism in the past feel they cannot "catch him" and may have stolen another account. Given the severity of which Greg wants to vandalise and feel he's unstoppable leads me to believe that he may have mental problems and should have any prior accounts and newly used accounts at WP:LTA, preferably in a subpage. --treelo _talk 03:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• RFCU filed for suspected user. [12] --treelo _talk 18:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Excuse me, I haven't been on Wikipedia for a while, so when I came on today, it had a note to my IP address about changes to its talk page. Apparently, I have the same IP address as this person....

I have two questions:

• 1. Is it even possible to have the same IP Address as someone else?
• 2. Will the banning of these accounts affect mine?

I really don't want to be connected to any of this, plese answer back. Pokemega32 (talk) 23:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To answer, yeah they can have the same IP address but not at the exact same time. The vandal's IP address has come from a pool of IP address for your ISP but won't affect you unless you use the same IP address again should it be blocked in which case you'll have to log in to edit. treelo _talk 16:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heres some information that might help from the previous failed check user [13] DietLimeCola (talk) 09:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Already been listed in the original case submission. --treelo _talk 14:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um the only thing I have to do with Rhode Island Hero, is that I live 12 houses away from him. And he is my friend.Greg Jungwirth (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that comment pretty much proves that you're a sock puppet of Rhode Island Hero. DietLimeCola (talk) 00:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Greg Jungwirth, The C. Leader, 3151253209225 leader are all indef blocked as a result of the RFCU case. Will look at the rest tomorrow. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

70.181.24.188 blocked 48 hours for continuing vandalism. 70.253.93.103's vengance, I.P. 70.253.93.103's vengance, and 70.253.93.103's vengance2 are all three blocked as username violations. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than write out all actions taken, see notes by each name. There is obviously something fishy going on here. "Crips r us" and Rhode Island Hero are not the masters, I think Greg Jungwirth is, so I'm tagging all in this case and the RFCU cases as such--at least they'll all be tagged the same too. — Rlevse • Talk • 13:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---