The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
Suspected sockpuppeteer

Tsatterca (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Svguerin3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
68.94.12.93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)(?)


Report submission by

Rudget


Evidence

I am not sure of this process and am still trying to find my way round after reading the SSP guidelines at the top of the page, but here goes. The user, Tsatterca, created on 15th November at 17:00 has been involved with a recent creation of an article entitled, Bricks In The Wall. This has been put up at AFD and has so far gained a consensus to delete. It was after the 5th !vote to delete was posted that, another user (Svguerin3), which had been created October 16th began to edit the AFD, defending the article. This user has so far made edits exclusively to the cause of this article, they were dormant before this. This user then started to edit the AFD, showing understanding of why the article should be deleted, (after the edits by other users at the AFD). The IP, 68.94.12.93, has made edits exclusively to the Bricks In The Wall article, however they have not participated in the AFD, so far.

I may be wrong here and will probably trying to prove something on a short supply of evidence. I will take any criticism of this thread, constructively. Regards, Rudget 16:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Blocked IP one week. Blocked named accounts indef. Suspect Tsatterca is a sock of someone too, but I don't know of whom.RlevseTalk 11:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions