August 25
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Allis-Chalmers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Malformed template that only serves as redirect to main namespace. To avoid misunderstandings: templates are not supposed to act as a simple redirect from the template namespace to the main namespace. Templates are supposed to "do" something (present an infobox, navigation or the likes). The Banner talk 18:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The edit summary "temp" may indicate an intention to develop the template later. However, in its current state it is confusing and serves no valid purpose. There is no need for it as some kind of placeholder. – Wdchk (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Request closure as template is edited into a useful template Jax 0677, please stop producing so many dodgy templates. Please, please. The Banner talk 20:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy deletion. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
unused and uncategorized. Frietjes (talk) 17:24, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Campaignbox Dzungars and Pacification of Xinjiang (1755–1759)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Campaignbox Dzungars and Pacification of Xinjiang (1755–1759) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
not a campaignbox. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Brooke Duff
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Brooke Duff (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
too soon. Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Boxtop2
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Boxtop2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
equivalent to ((userboxtop)) with |1=
blank. Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:BAB-Liste
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:BAB-Liste (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused import from another WP. Frietjes (talk) 15:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn after repairs to template, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Phil Keaggy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Malformed template that only serves as redirect to main namespace. The Banner talk 13:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To avoid misunderstandings: templates are not supposed to act as a simple redirect from the template namespace to the main namespace. Templates are supposed to "do" something (present an infobox, navigation or the likes). The Banner talk 18:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll make it something useful shortly. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. I will remove the notice on the discography page. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Request for closure The efforts of Walter have changed the template is a very usefull template. The Banner talk 18:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn now that template is fixed, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:59, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Dyson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Malformed template that only serves as redirect to main namespace. The Banner talk 13:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To avoid misunderstandings: templates are not supposed to act as a simple redirect from the template namespace to the main namespace. Templates are supposed to "do" something (present an infobox, navigation or the likes). The Banner talk 18:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The edit summary "temp" may indicate an intention to develop the template later. However, in its current state it is confusing and serves no valid purpose. There is no need for it as some kind of placeholder. – Wdchk (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Request closure as template is edited into a useful template Jax 0677, please stop producing so many dodgy templates. Please, please. The Banner talk 20:16, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Trace Bundy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
WP:NENAN The Banner talk 13:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - If Template:Lower Than Atlantis is being kept due to being "a useful template", then so should this. Do I need to specify which articles do not link to one another without the navbox?--Jax 0677 (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep He has 2 other albums which don't yet have articles, but if they did, it would put this just over the threshhold. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Article is at the threshold with 5 articles that do not all link to one another. This is all that NENAN specifically requires (if anything more than the artist article and four albums are required, please provide proof of this). Additionally, the rule of 5 is a guideline anyway. If needed, I will provide a list of articles that do not link to one another without use of the navbox.--Jax 0677 (talk) 18:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn because template was fixed, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:The Hoover Company (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Malformed template that only serves as redirect to main namespace. The Banner talk 13:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To avoid misunderstandings: templates are not supposed to act as a simple redirect from the template namespace to the main namespace. Templates are supposed to "do" something (present an infobox, navigation or the likes). The Banner talk 18:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The edit summary "temp" may indicate an intention to develop the template later. However, in its current state it is confusing and serves no valid purpose. There is no need for it as some kind of placeholder. – Wdchk (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Request closure as template is edited into a useful template The Banner talk 19:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn because template was fixed, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Endwell (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Malformed template that only serves as redirect to main namespace. The Banner talk 13:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To avoid misunderstandings: templates are not supposed to act as a simple redirect from the template namespace to the main namespace. Templates are supposed to "do" something (present an infobox, navigation or the likes). The Banner talk 18:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The edit summary "temp" may indicate an intention to develop the template later. However, in its current state it is confusing and serves no valid purpose. There is no need for it as some kind of placeholder. – Wdchk (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Request closure as template is edited into a useful template The Banner talk 19:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn because template was fixed, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Lower Than Atlantis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Malformed template that only serves as redirect to main namespace. The Banner talk 13:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To avoid misunderstandings: templates are not supposed to act as a simple redirect from the template namespace to the main namespace. Templates are supposed to "do" something (present an infobox, navigation or the likes). The Banner talk 18:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The edit summary "temp" may indicate an intention to develop the template later. However, in its current state it is confusing and serves no valid purpose. There is no need for it as some kind of placeholder. – Wdchk (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Request closure as template is edited into a useful template The Banner talk 19:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn because template was fixed, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Shabba Ranks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Malformed template that only serves as redirect to main namespace. The Banner talk 13:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To avoid misunderstandings: templates are not supposed to act as a simple redirect from the template namespace to the main namespace. Templates are supposed to "do" something (present an infobox, navigation or the likes). The Banner talk 18:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The edit summary "temp" may indicate an intention to develop the template later. However, in its current state it is confusing and serves no valid purpose. There is no need for it as some kind of placeholder. – Wdchk (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Request closure as template is edited into a useful template Jax 0677, please stop producing so many dodgy templates. Please, please. The Banner talk 19:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:KK Metalac Valjevo roster
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:29, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:KK Metalac Valjevo roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Metalac BC isn't playing Euroleague or any other European competition so this Euroleague template isn't necessary. Nightwolf87 (talk) 09:43, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Defunct college athletic conferences
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:30, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Sunrise Athletic Conference navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Dakota Athletic Conference navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Two NAIA and one NCAA conference which are now defunct. The templates are no longer transcluded on to any of the pages for the schools in the templates. Each template has a redirect of its former name which should be deleted as well. Dafoeberezin3494 (talk) 04:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.