The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:25, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikidepression (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded and unused. Aside from that its unlikely anyone would use it, if they were suffering from "Wikidepression" they would probably just walk away and not add the template at all. Kumioko (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I used it once. No opinion on deletion. If we need the bytes for more important stuff then so be it. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 02:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The problem is that it's passive-aggressive. If someone is depressed so be it; no need to sound out unspecified "advocates, pov-pushers, vandals and original researchers". Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, seems very passive aggressive. we already have slightly less passive aggressive ones like ((wikibreak3)). Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:20, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not only does this meet WP:NENAN by only having four articles, it is also completely overlapped by ((Puffy AmiYumi)) — literally every link on this template is also on that one. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - You obvious have no idea how necessary this is to the educational content of Wikipedia. The vibrant color used should have been an immediate indicator of how important Japanese animated series, teen pop and video games are. If we eradicate these contributors there will be no experienced editors left and the Wonderful World of Wikipedia will crumble. Exterminate! Exterminate! 65.94.50.163 (talk) 00:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lol wut? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• delete as redundant to ((Puffy AmiYumi)). Frietjes (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.