The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Start Mexmetro box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:STC line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

this template is now unused after I replaced it with ((s-line)). Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:18, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tlsx begin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tlsx end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

given the lack of use, we can probably kill this and just use ((tlsx)). Frietjes (talk) 22:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Table link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused outside of one user's space. Frietjes (talk) 22:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by JamesBWatson (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Subst-text (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. according to the edit history, this was created for use with a template which was deleted over 2 years ago. Frietjes (talk) 22:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• G8 as dependent on a deleted template. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:30, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SydBus Route Op Hours (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SZM stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SZM Lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Szs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 21:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:This-days-history (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 21:55, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tih (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, not even by Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries. Frietjes (talk) 21:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to ((zh-tw icon)) and easily confused with ((trad.)). Frietjes (talk) 21:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User and talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

rarely used and basically redundant to one of the large number of ((User information templates)). Frietjes (talk) 21:36, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:08, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ubk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

rarely used and basically redundant to ((usbk)). Frietjes (talk) 21:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Template:Usbk M'encarta (talk) 21:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User blocked (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Has been superseded by Template:Blocked user M'encarta (talk) 21:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant and unused. Make sure Template:User blocked/doc goes too. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USrail-header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replaced by template:BS-header. Frietjes (talk) 19:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Template:BS-header M'encarta (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Welsh castles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused cathead. Frietjes (talk) 19:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wesnothunit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WhiteRoute (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wnsource (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused citation template. Frietjes (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPFCleader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPNetball Announcements (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, WP Netball uses WP:Netball/News directly, rather than using this template. Frietjes (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vinod Chopra Productions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Vidhu Vinod Chopra serves the same purpose. Thanks. - Vivvt^Talk 18:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• delete as redundant. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 15:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ystari (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:42, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Prerequiste-OpenBSD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a single use template, and can be substed in. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 07:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Seeing as it links to only the most banal subjects (really, yes, I'm going to need a link to computer so that I have a hope of comprehending what OpenBSD is), I don't even think it needs substituted. Just get rid. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:17, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, we don't need it. using a sidebar for this sort of thing is non-standard. Frietjes (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I also say delete. The information in the sidebar isn't much use anyway. --TS 19:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP BOSOX INVITE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Wikiproject is inactive, we don't need an invite template D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Where in policy does it say that templates belonging to inactive Wikiprojects and task forces should be deleted? All it would take is one interested Wikipedian to resurrect the project. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Even if it is not active now (and the template on the project page merely says that it is believed to be semi-active) the template is still valid to invite editors to join and reactivate the project (which the template on the project page also encourages.) Rlendog (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP CINCINNATI REDS INVITE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Wikiproject is inactive, we don't need an invite template D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Where in policy does it say that templates belonging to inactive Wikiprojects and task forces should be deleted? All it would take is one interested Wikipedian to resurrect the project. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Even if it is not active now (and the template on the project page merely says that it is believed to be semi-active) the template is still valid to invite editors to join and reactivate the project (which the template on the project page also encourages.) Rlendog (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Dartmouth aspiration (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recommend delete. Not used. If needed we can modify Template:User Dartmouth to include wants to attend. Kumioko (talk) 01:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP:UTM/NA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The need for this template was deprecated a while ago and is no longer needed. Kumioko (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP:NYG invite (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded WikiProject invite template. The template is unused and the project itself was merged into WikiProject NFL quite a while ago. Kumioko (talk) 00:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted per WP:CSD#G7. Jenks24 (talk) 10:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP:CBTF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be a template that was created in an attempt to do some community building on WP that never got used. Kumioko (talk) 00:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's what it was. Go ahead and snuff it out. Thanks. • Q^#o • 01:07, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.