The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Three Star Club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template about a Nepalese football club that is not fully professional. There is no need for such detail when the parent article Three Star Club can be expanded to include players, records, etc. JMHamo (talk) 23:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 23:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Re: Three Star Club being not fully professional. I believe the nominator is not aware that the team played at the Asian Champion's league (AFC President's Cup). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayoopdog (talk • contribs) 13:53, 26 March 2014‎
• Delete - majority redlinks, serves no useful navigation and therefore no purpose. GiantSnowman 12:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - usefulness, not professionalism of the team are what matters here. Currently only two links. No issue with recreation if / when articles exist to populate it. Fenix down (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, not enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 17:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 April 27 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Carl Ekern Spirit of the Game Award (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Over templating, not a notable award and article leads to a unclear redirect. Delete Secret ^account 03:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable award. — X96lee15 (talk) 04:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep. Notable.24.49.133.210 (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Indian Cabinet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replaced by a simple wikitable in 7th Lok Sabha, which matches all the other Lok Sabha articles that list the cabinet (e.g., 15th Lok Sabha). Frietjes (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete using a table is simpler and looks better in this case.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.