December 28
Template:Yeovil Town F.C. Player of the Year
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete list as no single body has consistently given out a Yeovil Player of the Year award, thus the template is somewhat redundant. In addition no reliable source exists listing the past winners of Yeovil's end of season awards. Ytfc23 (talk) 22:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the club end-of-season awards are sufficient to take as the official award, as in every other similar template. No one singe source existing is not a problem. GiantSnowman 10:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as the club itself does not issue an award, but instead a number of different fan groups, there is no point in having a template. GiantSnowman 08:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- While I understand your reasoning, how can one decide who won the award in years where there wasn't a unified winner as each of the awards are independent of the club, thus I don't see how you can place greater value on one supporters group over another. Below I've tried to summarise the winners of the award to demonstrate the problem. Ytfc23 (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't use supporter's groups - only the club's official Player of the Year. If there was no unified winner then it should not be included. GiantSnowman 13:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as I am aware, (certainly not in the last 15 years) there has never been an official Player of the Year and that is my principle issue with the template. Ytfc23 (talk) 13:36, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you know where ciderspace got their Player of the Year information from?--EchetusXe 16:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know exactly where they got the Player of the Year information, but I think the Ciderspace history section as a whole has been transcribed from a feature in the match day programme in the 90s. Ytfc23 (talk) 17:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: If the club does not officially name their player of the year then there should not be a template. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 22:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Minoru Kunizawa
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Navigation template where all but one of the relevant articles have been deleted. Nothing left to navigate. • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. Rehman 06:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 7. Primefac (talk) 17:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 7. Primefac (talk) 17:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Rivers of Northern Province, Sri Lanka
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 7. Primefac (talk) 17:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Obsolete. Replaced by ((Inland waters of Sri Lanka)) Rehman 14:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete works for me here per the nom. --Izno (talk) 12:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).