The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as not useful for it's intended purpose: navigation Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ambassadors of Albania (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All associated articles in this navbox have been deleted after AFDs, leaving one blue link, which is a redirect. KTC (talk) 17:38, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete pointless having a template with no valid entries. LibStar (talk) 12:32, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. St★lwart¹¹¹ 00:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The primary purpose of a navbox is to facilitate easy navigation among closely related topics. This navbox has one linked article, and 25+ red links to nowhere. In short, this navbox serves no valid navbox purpose. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 04:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Extremely pointless. It's not like we are gonna work on them again. Jackninja5 (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.