The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was 'delete as redundant Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:54, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Government of China (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created by 彭家杰 (talk · contribs), who does not appear to have any interest in engaging in productive discussion or does not speak English. I find that many Chinese government related articles are getting extremely unwieldy because of the large number of templates placed on them, and in any case this template is duplicated by the footer navbox [[Template:State Council of the People's Republic of China]]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colipon (talk • contribs) 19:48, 28 January 2015‎

• Weak delete as redundant, overly large sidebar. —PC-XT+ 07:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. --TIAYN (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per nominator. Jackninja5 (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Colipon, it would be courteous if you would notify the creator (and main contributor) of the template about this TfD discussion. Maybe you feel this would be pointless given your stance that the editor has no "interest in engaging in productive discussion or does not speak English". However, the editor's edits and edit summaries do not give the impression the editor does not speak English, and the editor's Talk page revisions show only messages - including two by you, in which you express yourself and urge the editor to do things - that in my opinion are not necessarily invitations to dialog. Your message on the template's Talk page is, but that page may not be one of the editor's "watched" pages. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 17:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just placed the notification on the user's talk page. —PC-XT+ 17:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst and delete as only used in an indefintely blocked users userspace Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Silver Frames Production (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created by user blocked for WP:CORPNAME; not used by anything other than user's sandbox Drm310 (talk) 17:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I would subst and speedy delete as test or non-controversial. —PC-XT+ 07:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as not useful for navigation, failing its primary purpose Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adam Air (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with only 2 links to articles other than the airline itself. Those articles, both aviation accidents, are linked by a aviation accident template because they both happened in the same year. Destinations link is a redirect to the Adam Air article Further links in this template are unlikely because Adam Air went out of business. ...William 12:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Having the template at the three articles included in it is a redundancy, as the linked pages can perfectly be included in different portions of the text.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as a navbox that doesn't navigate Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2011–12 UEFA Futsal Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not needed. was only used on the tournament site, where it repeated info. deleted it from that article. Koppapa (talk) 12:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The primary purpose of a navbox is to permit quick navigation among related articles. This "navbox" template is overwhelmingly composed of unlinked topics for which no Wikipedia article exists. This template thus fails the fundamental test of a navbox. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as a navbox that doesn't navigate Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:03, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2010–11 UEFA Futsal Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not needed. was only used on the tournament site, where it repeated info. deleted it from that article. Koppapa (talk) 12:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The primary purpose of a navbox is to permit quick navigation among related articles. This "navbox" template is overwhelmingly composed of unlinked topics for which no Wikipedia article exists. This template (and its sister above) thus fails the fundamental test of a navbox. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as not useful Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PetInfobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:N. Doesn't link to anything, probably has something to do with creator's other articles that have been deleted and/or merged. Soetermans. T / C 10:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete then. -Koppapa (talk) 12:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unused and unnecessary. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as a tamplate navigating between non-notable subjects

Template:List of Dogs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:N. Doesn't link to anything, probably has something to do with creator's other articles that have been deleted and/or merged. Soetermans. T / C 10:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete the title of the page has nothing to do with its actual topic, since it is overly generic. The creator's articles have been deleted -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 08:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete Not notable. (For anyone wondering what the Template overview contains: Joseph Garrett tells stories within Minecraft as "Stampy", and this Stampy has several virtual dogs.) --82.136.210.153 (talk) 12:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for explaining that. I say delete as it has nothing to do with the articles it links, and fails all requirements of WP:NAVBOX. —PC-XT+ 14:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.