April 19
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure). ~ RobTalk 14:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This template is pointless if not used in Panama Papers page. George Ho (talk) 07:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:WLS-TV On-air Staff
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted here. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 00:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is nothing but fan cruft and WikiProject TV Stations does not use navboxes for local TV personalities. Not to mention this goes against WP:NOTTVGUIDE. ☔️ Corkythehornetfan 🌺 00:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is probably better accomplished by a category.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I think such a category would not be WP:DEFINE would be summarily deleted. A navbox does not have that same requirement. --Izno (talk) 02:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I have fixed the template such that it can be used without violating NOTTVGUIDE. That leave the claim that it is fancruft--one which I find to be specious; the template is like any other navbox in listing the people working at the company--and the claim that WP:TVSTATIONS gets to decide what kind of navboxes we can or cannot have; another specious claim per WP:LOCALCON. Keep the modified template, which provides an appropriate level of navigation between the staff articles currently on-wiki. --Izno (talk) 02:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Philippine TV navboxes
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted here. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 00:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No useful navigation; only navigate two to three articles each. Sixth of March 00:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Star Parivaar Award templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete all. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 14:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above award categories doesn’t even have their own independent pages and they are all unsourced and fail WP:V. These templates are also been created by known socks Chander (talk · contribs · count), Sukriti3 (talk · contribs · count), Noormohammed satya (talk · contribs · count) and one possible WP:SPA AgunDana (talk · contribs · count). §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all into Template:Star Parivaar Awards. There is a stand-alone article for Star Parivaar Awards, so a corresponding template may be appropriate. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- But the article doesn't even mention any of the winners backed with WP:RS. The award itself is of questionable notability being an in-house trophy looting ceremony. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ RobTalk 12:55, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- delete all, or convert them to list articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsourced claims of fame should not exist in list form either. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:12, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 15:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Template:Chest trauma with Template:Trauma.
Duplicate scope (and at least 50% of contents!) Contents have better navigational value if included all together. So I propose a merge Tom (LT) (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ RobTalk 12:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).