The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 23. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:52, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:US Presidential Administrations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:US Presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Geobox coor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Module:Geobox coor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template (and the module that it invokes) has been replaced by ((coord)) in all templates and articles. It is no longer transcluded in article space. See Wikipedia:Coordinates in infoboxes for more details. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, no longer needed (and I merged the module discussion with this one). Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Deletionlist-Canadian province (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Author note Apparently unused. This was intended to be used on Canadian province deletion lists (such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/British Columbia) in the same way that ((deletionlist-USstate)) is being used on its lists. Instead, templates like ((Deletionlist|British Columbia|Canada|categorysuffixhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/British_Columbia&action=edit=by Canadian province)) are being used. Not sure if this template was deprecated at some point or if it was just never implemented. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 03:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:DC-Thomson-copyright (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused from 2008; pretty sure this goes against our own copyright system. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• One in a series of comics-themed FUR templates. As it is unused, delete. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 03:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. ℯxplicit 02:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cratchat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused box from 2008 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• No objection to deletion, given the fact that it is unused. Not clear on what spurred me to put this one together, but I seem to have spent a whopping 16 minutes or so on it so it couldn't have been a major deal. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Copied howto (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: A long-unused and seemingly forgotten template. Drdpw (talk) 17:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Colonial New England (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No clear inclusion criteria or navigable purpose, also unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: an unused template, too vague to be of use as a navigational tool. Drdpw (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cinema of Venezuela (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, most of the content in here actually links to categories which is not valid navigation Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• comment, navigation between categories is perfectly valid. but, since it's not used, I would say we can delete it. Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).