The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The Conglomerate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. One album and one member with articles. No improvement to existing navigational means by having this. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --woodensuperman 09:14, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jackson Jackson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No independent articles here except for related bands who show up in the "associated acts" section of each band's infobox/article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --woodensuperman 09:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Georgia Firebirds roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template for a now defunct team. Older info from template was merged into the team page. Yosemiter (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2009–10 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2010–11 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2011–12 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2012–13 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2013–14 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2014–15 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2015–16 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2016–17 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2014–15 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2015–16 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2016–17 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (women's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single-use templates which are not needed since the lists of teams are already in 2009–10 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (women's handball), 2010–11 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (women's handball), ... Frietjes (talk) 15:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. (Suggestion - perhaps this season's template Template:2016–17 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) teamlist could be moved to Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) current teamlist and once a year updated and removed from dropped teams.) Batternut (talk) 09:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2011–12 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (men's handball) teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, the list of teams is in 2011–12 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (men's handball)#Team information Frietjes (talk) 15:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2011 Pacific Games men's football tournament group talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, no clear purpose Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2011-12 NBL Canada Standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, duplicates 2011–12 NBL Canada season#Standings Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2008 TAC Cup Ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2009 TAC Cup Ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2010 TAC Cup Ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2011 TAC Cup Ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2012 TAC Cup Ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, no parent article. Frietjes (talk) 14:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all for now considering there's no parent articles. I do see some merit in parent articles being created as they would have enough coverage to meet GNG, so if they do eventually get created I don't have a problem with these templates being recreated, but until that happens, there's no need for these templates. Flickerd (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Flickerd. With a caveat that they should be undeleted if articles are ever created for those seasons. Jenks24 (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Donegal Football Team 1983 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused redundant template JMHamo (talk) 14:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JMHamo, can you explain how it is redundant? Frietjes (talk) 14:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Frietjes: Maybe I should have said abandoned since 2014, with no obvious article for its inclusion. Serves no useful purpose in my opinion. JMHamo (talk) 14:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn now that it has been added to one article. I will start a broader discussion about these single-use templates. Frietjes (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:1998 Winter Olympics Finland men's ice hockey team roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and the only roster in Category:1998 Winter Olympics templates. the members of this bronze-medal-winning team are in Ice hockey at the 1998 Winter Olympics#Medalists, so it's not clear where this would be used. Frietjes (talk) 13:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This roster is used on Finland at the 1998 Winter Olympics as are others like it for their respective years. -DJSasso (talk) 12:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:09, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The Crookes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. --woodensuperman 09:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox NFL team rings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No clear indication of what it would be used for. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom and the creator's edit history is disturbing. Frietjes (talk) 13:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Petty family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No parent article, no evidence that these people are collectively called the "Petty family". No obvious connection besides last name. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, primarily on the grounds that the nominaton makes it clear the nominator has not actually investigated the item he is nominating. Um...TPH, it's been years. I went on WikiBreak for a couple of years. And I came back and you're still making XfD nominations that are...I'll go with 'difficult to understand'. If you had actually checked the articles before coming here to declare "no obvious connection besides last name" you would have noticed that they are...what's the word...ah, yes, a family. In order: Patriarch, son, son, grandson, grandson, great-grandson, great-granddaughter (bluelink: great-grandsoninlaw), nephew to son. Googling "Petty family" has Google recognise that there is a family and show the - correct - family members (along with several more not Wikinotable). There is even a book on the family. Now, whether this should be a template or merely a category may be something worth debating, but...well, WP:HAMMER is a handy tool at XfDs, but please, please more deeply consider your nominations. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject NASCAR has been notified in a neutral fashion of this discussion. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per The Bushranger. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 01:39, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).