July 24
2004 ICC Champions Trophy Squad templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 19:35, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't win the championship; squad membership can be found in 2004 ICC Champions Trophy squads; per 2018 March 1 discussion. See also 2018 February 16, 25 July 2017, 29 December 2016, 18 December 2014, 8 December 2014, ... ) Frietjes (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Abishe, Ajf773, Dissident93, Joseph2302, Lugnuts, Mamyles, Plastikspork, Steven (Editor), and Störm: notifying prior discussion participants. Frietjes (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per previous consensus. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per previous consensus, no need to include non-champions from every season. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 15:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, same situation. Steven (Editor) (talk) 17:49, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete same reasons as the last couple of discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. Same reasons as the multiple previous nominations. Ajf773 (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I agree upon the consensus reached in the Afd discussion. Abishe (talk) 04:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Yilin Zhong
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ∯WBGconverse 09:44, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The template is populated with redlinks, and that will not change anytime soon - the books of this author lack individual notability, and most of the articles (created by a SPA, who also created this template) have been deleted or redirected to the article about the author. If she does produce a considerable number of notable works a template can be created, but at this time it should be deleted. bonadea contributions talk 07:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ∯WBGconverse 09:45, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Template:Catfd2 with Template:Tfd2.
Refile a new TfD: Can we use |module=:Category in ((tfd2)) after adding some options to ((tfd2)) instead using ((Catfd2)), thanks. Hhkohh (talk) 07:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- do not merge, seems to be working fine as it is right now. Frietjes (talk) 15:41, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Husbands of British princesses
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 9. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Pre-1911 Chinese Military
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 9. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).