The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Computer form factors. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Form factors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• We have Template:Computer form factors, Template:Computer case form factors, and Template:Form factors. They all do essentially the same function, and we probably only need one, so which do we keep? The navbox or the sidebar, and then the free-form or table sidebar? --Bsherr (talk) 17:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd go with ((Form factors)) as it is the less intrusieve option. There is no need for this subject to be on the side. --Gonnym (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Template:Form factors and use it to replace Template:Computer form factors and Template:Computer case form factors. Very few other computer hardware navboxes are sidebars. The listed dimensions just add clutter and are inaccurate in some instances (such as EATX which is not formally defined, NLX which can vary, and COM Express which comes in 4 sizes). Also, organizing by category instead of by size is more useful for navigation. --Abgnac (talk) 23:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• reverse merge with Template:Computer form factors to create a navbox with the size information. Frietjes (talk) 14:21, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 5. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Super_Over (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Module:Super_Over (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikiProject International law (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is no longer in use. According to WP:Wikiproject International law, it is no longer to be used. I have replaced all remaining instances of it with the International relations box. StudiesWorld (talk) 22:10, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:FailedGA/Small (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, except for one use in an archive here. Unnecessary because ((FailedGA)) has a |small= parameter. e^πi (talk | contribs) 13:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Genome header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used, probably not that much use from the beginning Artoria2e5 🌉 01:05, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Table headers are by their nature, wont to change, and standardizing templates can be tricky as a result. Unused table header templates are certainly unnecessary. e^πi (talk | contribs) 11:28, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Just as an additional note, this edit is where the header was originally added, and Artoria2e5 changed the table format in this edit. e^πi (talk | contribs) 21:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:QF. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:QF-NPOV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:QF-source (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:QF-tags (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:QF-unfolding (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:QF-unstable (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:QF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:QF-NPOV, Template:QF-source, Template:QF-tags, Template:QF-unfolding and Template:QF-unstable with Template:QF.
I've just created ((QF)) to merge the functionality of all these templates. It takes no more typing to put the rationale into a parameter (|) instead of a hyphen (-) after the template. Since the templates are subst-only, no transclusion cleanup is required, so these can be cleanly deleted. e^πi (talk | contribs) 00:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 09:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).