2014 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF and OFC) templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Purely administrative action Fenix down (talk) 22:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:16, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Crystal Shawanda
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NENAN, had more content which was deleted or redirected, now leaving just 3 links. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:2032 Summer Olympic venues
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:TOOSOON, event is 14 years away. Parent article Venues of the 2032 Summer Olympics and Paralympics doesn't exist, has more redlinks than blue, not used. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The 2032 Summer Olympics doesn't even have a host venue so I think this falls under WP:HOAX and also WP:TOOSOON for now. HawkAussie (talk) 22:50, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Slightly confused because 2032 Summer Olympics indicates that a winning bid for these games won't be selected until 2025, and Monterray is not listed at all. So it's either highly speculative at best, or a hoax at worst, but either way it is years away from being of any use. PC78 (talk) 22:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Article content templates by Ephert
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete after merging where possible (where it's not a copyvio and with proper attribution where possible) Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:03, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per template guideline #1: "Templates should not normally be used to store article text". Those which contain quotations are especially problematic because storing them in the template namespace may constitute copyright violation. Nardog (talk) 00:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- delete after merging with the articles (with attribution). Frietjes (talk) 12:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Frietjes: Can you clarify what you mean by "attribution"? You mean CC-BY-SA/GFDL-compliant attribution to the author(s) of the templates, or something else? Nardog (talk) 23:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Nardog, whenever I merge single-use templates I provide a list of the editors in the edit summary to make it clear who is responsible for the content in the form being it is being merged. Frietjes (talk) 11:59, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. So you do mean CC-BY-SA/GFDL-compliant attribution in other words, then. Nardog (talk) 12:01, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- yes, although clearly if they violate copyright law, then they should be simply deleted. Frietjes (talk) 12:03, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- delete but I'm not sure that all of these tables will meet our copyright policy even if attributed. Again asking User:Diannaa for her opinion. Doug Weller talk 18:54, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- NONE should be merged without assessing for copyright compliance. Most of the ones I spot-checked contain enough creative content to qualify for copyright protection and will have to be deleted. (Template:Hanihara1970Table1, Template:GenographicProjectMongolian, Template:Glocker2009Table1, Template:Matsumoto 1982 Table 3, and Template:Kroeber1948Figure8 for example will have to be deleted as G12.) Template:JohannBlumenbachFiveVarieties contains PD material but needs attribution (via
((PD-notice))). — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).