Template:Hyderabad Metro color
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:The LGBT Barnstar. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unused template and the topic can fall under Template:The LGBT Barnstar. JudeccaXIII (talk) 03:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not techinically true this is an
[u]nused template
. It's been used at least once. This template came about through this and this discussion. It might be worth inviting those few users to the current discussion. I should just write an essay called Barnstars are cheap because that's how I feel about them. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- That one user hasn't edited Wiki since July 31, 2018, and as far as I can tell by the first discussion at WP:WPWPA, Maranjosie did not receive consensus to add to the Awards project. Instead, the editor made his/her own consensus and then went to another project to do the same. I did that once, but that didn't mean I was allowed to insert to the Awards project. The Awards project has a goal to remaster barnstars 1.0 to barnstar 2.0, and we even have a guidline how to do so. I'm basically reiterating "Adding a barnstar to the list". JudeccaXIII (talk) 19:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Eh, noone will miss it so I see no harm in deleting it, but in general I agree that barnstars are quite cheap andt think it's kind of a waste even discussing them. I've boldly redirected a few duplicate userboxes with very low usage and noone has complained. I would go the same route with further duplicate barnstars, especially since barnstars are substituted and redirecting shouldn't change any exsisting transclusions. --Trialpears (talk) 21:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Islamophobia by country
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 October 2. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:32, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Venezuela Squad 1990 FIBA World Championship
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Navbox creep and previous discussions noting regular consensus to delete this type of material arguments make this decision clear. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 September 7 came to the conclusion that the deletion of this template and several related ones linked therein needs to be discussed at TFD rather than simply treated as ancillary to the deletion of Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 8#Template:Angola Squad 2014 FIBA Basketball World Cup. This is a procedural nomination; I am myself neutral on the point. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete having a navbox on every squad who ever played in a significant competition is excessive and will result in large numbers of navboxes appearing on athlete articles. Nor does playing a few games together do much to tie the players together. It could be justified if the teams achieved something significant but that clearly isn't the case, the Venezuelan team came 11th and didn't make it out of the group stage. Plenty of prior discussions have come to similar conclusions, see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here. Hut 8.5 15:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as navbox creep per precedent. we don't need these for non-medal winning squads. Frietjes (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep almost all we keep (or should keep) squad infoboxes for significant international tournaments regardless of placing, which for basketball include both (and only) the FIBA World Cup and the Summer Olympics. (See cricket, football, baseball, rugby, et cetera mentioned here.) They're helpful and easily collapsible at the bottom of the page, see Stipe Pletikosa for an example. The Angola qualifier template can be deleted, though. SportingFlyer T·C 00:59, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - If we are going to be honest here, if this does get deleted, then why not go and delete the FIFA World Cup templates that didn't get in the top three. So on that front, I will be voting for Keep all except for the Angola qualifier template which can be deleted. HawkAussie (talk) 23:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 October 2. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:East Cornwall League
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 October 2. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Classical music festival
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Only 3 links. This can all be done with See also links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).