< November 24 November 26 >

November 25

Template:Furry Topicon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7 by User:Athaenara. However I made a reworked version in my user space at User:PorkchopGMX/sandbox/furry topicon, so this also may be considered as Userfy, however I think that is unlikely as the creator of the original template didn’t userfy it. (Incoming redirects were also speedy deleted.) (non-admin closure) Use ((re|PorkchopGMX)) to ping (Push to talk) 18:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Broken and unused topicon. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ftd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) EN-JungwonTalk 08:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unused --TheImaCow (talk) 20:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep as it says on the page, it's an always susbt template. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 21:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC).Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FrenchPostwarAircraft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unused, very unusual navbox format --TheImaCow (talk) 20:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Broken map templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All of these are unused and broken --TheImaCow (talk) 20:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FieldHockeyAt1920SummerOlympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sidebar with only one link --TheImaCow (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Requests for feedback templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 4. (non-admin closure) EN-JungwonTalk 08:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lang-he-n

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. after replacing with ((Lang-he)). Consensus that a redirect would not be helpful and potentially confusing. Primefac (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Propose mergingredirecting Template:Lang-he-n to Template:Lang-he.
This was proposed on the talkpage in 2010 and in 2015. The latter discussion was closed as "Nominate it for a merge at TFD", which was never done. The reasons remain the same: ((Lang-he)) is perfectly capable of showing niqqud, so this template is superfluous. In addition there are two problems with this template: 1. the one raised in this talkpage discussion, that this template is meant for text in the Hebrew language, but transcludes another template which is specifically meant for Hebrew script which is not actually in the Hebrew language. 2. the fact that it uses another font than ((Lang-he)) makes it stand out (although that can be changed by changing the fonts in Template:Script/styles hebrew.css, I guess), and also makes it more prone to change (like what happened after this edit, as can be seen in this talkpage discussion). The second problem is not much of an issue, of course, but still. Debresser (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I invited all editors whom the template history showed to have edited this template more than incidentally to comment here. Debresser (talk) 16:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Hebrew: ?'"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000001-QINU`"'?בֵּית‎, lit. home
  • [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]]: <span lang="he" dir="rtl">בֵּית</span>, <small>[[Literal translation|lit.]]&thinsp;</small>&#39;home&#39;
The obvious differences are:
((lang-he-n)) uses ((script/Hebrew)); ((lang-he)) does not
((lang-he-n)) does not have a lang=he html attribute
((lang-he-n)) italicizes the linked static text 'lit.'
((lang-he-n)) does not render the value assigned to |lit= as a linguistic gloss (not wrapped in single quotes)
If the proposal is to merge some or all of these differences into ((lang-he)), then I will have to oppose because Module:Lang should not be tweaked to support exceptions to the style it applies to the renderings of all of the other ((lang-??)) templates.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @Trappist the monk: I meant redirecting or replacing. Debresser (talk) 16:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I can support replacement of ((lang-he-n)), wherever it exists, with ((lang-he)). Since you apparently do not mean that these templates should be merged, it would probably be best to change the ((tfd links)) templates and bolded text at the top of this discussion and to also change the ((Tfm/dated)) template at ((lang-he-n)).
    —Trappist the monk (talk) 17:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What about ((rtl-lang|he))? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Very much support. Would cause fewer headaches for people deciding on which one they should be using, and lang-he-n is most certainly redundant anyway. Stephen Walch (talk) 18:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree that after the replacement, ((Lang-he-n)) can be deleted. Debresser (talk) 11:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree with you regarding the font. I personally also prefer the font of Lang-he-n over the Lang-he font, which is less classical and more modern. Debresser (talk) 16:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sandbox heading/Talk/doc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 07:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Moxy under WP:CSD#G2 as a test page FASTILY 05:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tllsep/begin and Template:Tllsep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 07:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unused/redundant template. The redirect Template:Tllsep/end is also nominated for deletion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 25#Template:Tllsep/end -- /Alex/21 01:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
More