< December 28 December 30 >

December 29

Template:Saturn Award for Best New Media Superhero Series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @86.10.25.197 with the reason "Navbox with only two links so not enough" FASTILY 21:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:VSB station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused train templates. Gonnym (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Decoration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, undocumented template. Seems to refer to "decorations" as in awards. User:GKFXtalk 13:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HOLtotal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in one talk page, which can be replaced with ((HOL|total)) or subst or commented out. Gonnym (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Officeholder table/shortname

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused subpage of Template:Officeholder table. Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 15:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PLANETNAME

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template that inexplicably translates month names to planet names, so ((PLANETNAME|July)) returns Uranus. Also accepts numerical input. I suspect that it's a test page as it's basically a copy of ((MONTHNAME)), including its documentation, with some words changed. User:GKFXtalk 11:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country showdata/mirror

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one version and it is not used. Q28 (talk) 00:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I think this is used e.g. to sync a sandbox with the main template. Personally I write ((subst:msgnw:../)) if I want to do this, which is actually easier than writing ((subst:country showdata/mirror)). (Ordinary copying and pasting also works.) No need for a template to help with the process. User:GKFXtalk 11:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brick chart/Blocks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links AFAICT. Appears to be an abandoned, experimental fork of ((Brick chart/Bricks)), which is used and continues to be updated. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indian club football

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated, hasn't been edited since 2014. Any relevant content is now contained at Template:Football in India. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 04:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australian Senators/adv and sibling political party color subpages

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These background color templates were removed from their parent template after this talk page discussion. Their use probably violated some part of MOS, since color was being used on its own to identify party affiliation, so I don't think they can be used again. If colors are needed to label political parties, the new, comprehensive Module:Political party should probably be used instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Afd-merge from multi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. No evidence that it was ever substed in its current form. This template was last edited in 2014, and the potential need for it appears to be handled by ((Afd-merged-from)) or possibly ((Article history)), so it should be safe to delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 15:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AfC-c/col

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. I found no evidence that this template or its redirect are used by on any pages on en.WP. The hex colors in this template are hard-coded into ((AfC-c)), where this template may have been used in the past. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adoption notice expired for bots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. I found no evidence that this template in its current form has been substed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2004 Summer Olympics men's field hockey game A2 and siblings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These templates either have zero transclusions or one transclusion. These templates' content exists (or could exist after substing) as a single, populated ((Fieldhockeybox)) template, along with dozens of others, at Field hockey at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament, so they do not need their own dedicated template pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FormerFT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. Functionality has been added to Template:Featuredtopictalk and is working fine (see Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Devil May Cry titles). – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fos2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deprecated template is marked "keep as historical", but there are no longer any transclusions or incoming links, so it can safely be deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IDsign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links. Only edits were in March 2020. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:High Speed 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, and no link to a main article, possibly because this railway line is barely even an idea. See High Speed 3 (a redirect). – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unbuilt railways can be subject to significant changes so definitive-looking routemaps seem unlikely to be useful. User:GKFXtalk 11:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HMSouthSydneyRabbitohsLadder and similar rugby standings templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The articles that these standings templates may have been used in should have simply contained them as tables, and the articles appear to have been PRODded or otherwise deleted, so the tables are no longer useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HOL ineligible

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Template content is a single two-digit number. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hatching

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Empty template with nice documentation, but no transclusions and no incoming links. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hashemite-Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. If it was ever used, it appears that the navboxes ((Jordanian princes)) and ((Kings of Jordan)) are preferred today. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
More