Template:Free and paid online education
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The two primary defining categories of this template - paid and free - are unworkably simplistic and misleading with many of the listed organizations employing many different models. It might be possible to construct a new template with appropriate categories but this one is fatally defective. ElKevbo (talk) 22:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll defer to ElKevbo's judgement as I'm not overly familiar with online education. I'm not sure I see anything fatally flawed here, though; couldn't we just remove the grouping so that they're all alphabetical and move the navbox to ((Online education))? ((u|Sdkb)) talk 07:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- We could do that but I'm just not sure how a template of any kind would be helpful for readers. This is a very complex market with every possible permutation of services and fees and I don't know how a template can capture any of that. Frankly, I'm also worried about this is a spam magnet given the always shifting players in this market and how eager VCs (and universities) have always been to fund new companies; I'm pleased and surprised that this hasn't yet been a significant, lasting problem but I wonder if that's only because the template isn't used in many places so it has rather low visibility. ElKevbo (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (without replacing) The paid/free — and even nonprofit/for-profit — categories are sometimes misleading because several institutions leverage different subtleties and nuances. Mᵒdᵘlᵃtᵒ.📩 13:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Störm (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without replacing per Modulato. I just don't see any permutation of this navbox serving a useful navigational value, there are way too many ways and nuances and variations for a navbox to be useful. I think this is best served by a category. --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Yemen NFT results
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The template isn't used now. HawkAussie (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The results were once split into several articles but they have now been combined, making the template unnecessary. Nigej (talk) 08:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Nigeria national football team. Primefac (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not used now. HawkAussie (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).