The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Saurashtra_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1952 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Hyderabad_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1952 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Chhattisgarh_Legislative_Assembly_election,_2013 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Coorg_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1952 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Sikkim state assembly elections results, 2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A single-use template. Should be substituted on to the 2009 Sikkim Legislative Assembly election article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Substitute and delete. I concur. --Bsherr (talk) 01:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:LS2005-Shimoga (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and not clear for what purpose this template was created for. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Shimoga (Lok Sabha constituency) uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 21:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Goa_legislative_assembly_election,_2012 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Travancore-Cochin_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1952 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Travancore-Cochin_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1954 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Vindhya_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1952 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bhopal_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1952 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election, 1952 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election, 1957 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election, 2013 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

1952 is single-use and should be substituted onto the 1952 Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election. 1957 and 2013 are used on two pages and should be substitued where used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete - subst to specific election page and section transclude to elections in India page. Gonnym (talk) 21:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Assam_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1952 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Assam_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1957 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Assam_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1967 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Andhra_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1955 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Andhra_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1957 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Andhra_Pradesh_state_assembly_elections_results,_2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ajmer_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1952 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:20, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Indian general election results, 2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use. Propose substituting on the 2014 elections in India where it is used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Substitute and delete. I concur. --Bsherr (talk) 00:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:20, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tamil_Nadu_Legislative_Assembly_election,_2016 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:20, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tamil Nadu legislative election results by alliance 1977 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu legislative election results by alliance 1980 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu legislative election results by alliance 1984 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu legislative election results by alliance 1989 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu legislative election results by alliance 1991 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu legislative election results by alliance 2001 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu legislative election results by alliance 2006 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu legislative election results by alliance 2011 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

1989 is unused and should be substituted on the mainspace election article. The 2011 template is used on two article and the rest are single-use and should be substitued onto the respective election year articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Substitute and delete. I concur with the nominator. The 2011 template can be substitute into the detailed results article and then section transcluded into the main article, since it is essentially the only information in its section. --Bsherr (talk) 00:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:20, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tamil Nadu lok sabha election results by alliance 1996 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu lok sabha election results by alliance 1998 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu lok sabha election results by alliance 1999 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu lok sabha election results by alliance 2004 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tamil Nadu lok sabha election results by alliance 2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All single-use templates and should be substituted on the respective election year articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 06:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Indian general elections results by alliance 2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. 2009 general election article uses a different table for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unused. --Bsherr (talk) 01:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 01:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Yannick Filipović series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This seems completely pointless, not really needed in the article it was on. Govvy (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not enough notability for a sidebar and one linked article that is subject to an Afd that will most likely be deleted. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; unnecessary template. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 20:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Govvy (talk) 20:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 20:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I agree that this is completely unnecessary Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not needed, as not enough articles to warrant it. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - pretty clearly not helpful for navigation, especially since the only page it links to (aside from the Bio) is on the path to deletion. As I noted in my duplicative nom (I blame the technology for that error), even very notable players like Neymar do not have templates like this. A very new player obviously does not warrant this type of template. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 13:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:FANCRUFT. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 15:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete utterly pointless, only article on it is a "career achievements" page that is getting piled on in its own deletion nomination. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:FD08:8733:2B16:CAAF (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 01:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cleanup/Articles with probable cleanup sectionon talk page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A list of (outdated) links, not really something to use as a template. Not used anywhere. Gonnym (talk) 17:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not a template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BibRecord (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Not sure if ever was used. Gonnym (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No changes since 2012. Unused. --Bsherr (talk) 01:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Arkansas Union Regiments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to ((Military unit sidebar)) with |title=Arkansas Union Regiments, no need for a separate sidebar Frietjes (talk) 15:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

• Delete Military unit sidebar should replace where this template is being used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. This has been discussed over a prolonged period and recently closed as no consensus. Re-discussing so soon is an abuse of process. Cabayi (talk) 14:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Final Fantasy VII chronology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The following template should be deleted for the following reasons:

• Being used as a second navigation box, when articles the template is on already have such a navigational box in place. Claims that it is needed for navigation in previous discussion are unfounded reasons.
• Questionable reason for needing to detail chronology of the series on each entry's article (regardless of medium of entry). Such information should really be explained on the main article's page, both to explain the plot details and developers reasoning for the fictional settings chronology for entries.
• Pure WP:FANCRUFT - Wikipedia is a general encyclopaedia, not a fandom site for any form of fiction.

GUtt01 (talk) 14:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. This has been discussed over a prolonged period and recently closed as no consensus. Re-discussing so soon is an abuse of process. Cabayi (talk) 14:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Metal Gear chronology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The following template should be deleted for the following reasons:

• Being used as a second navigation box, when articles the template is on already have such a navigational box in place. Claims that it is needed for navigation in previous discussion are unfounded reasons.
• Questionable reason for needing to detail chronology of the series on each entry's article (regardless of medium of entry). Such information should really be explained on the main article's page, both to explain the plot details and developers reasoning for the fictional settings chronology for entries.
• Pure WP:FANCRUFT - Wikipedia is a general encyclopaedia, not a fandom site for any form of fiction.

GUtt01 (talk) 14:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. This has been discussed over a prolonged period and recently closed as no consensus. Re-discussing so soon is an abuse of process. Cabayi (talk) 14:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Kingdom Hearts chronology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The following template should be deleted for the following reasons:

• Being used as a second navigation box, when articles the template is on already have such a navigational box in place. Claims that it is needed for navigation in previous discussion are unfounded reasons.
• Questionable reason for needing to detail chronology of the series on each entry's article (regardless of medium of entry). Such information should really be explained on the main article's page, both to explain the plot details and developers reasoning for the fictional settings chronology for entries.
• Pure WP:FANCRUFT - Wikipedia is a general encyclopaedia, not a fandom site for any form of fiction.

GUtt01 (talk) 14:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).