Module:TemplateTools
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused pre-alpha module; no edits since 2014. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:NorthSouth
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Navigation template for a rail line without an article. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:No space joiner superscript bullet no space non joiner
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Same reason as ((No space joiner bold superscript middot no space non joiner)) - excessively long name for something not particularly useful (and unused). Elli (talk | contribs) 13:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:NYCLcolor
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No longer used. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Monument Morocco
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused; neither of the categories this template can categorize articles in exists or has ever existed. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:MonitoredByBot
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Entirely unused and linked to nowhere. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Mongolian election data
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. See previous nomination of Template:Mongolian legislative election, 2008. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Live at the World Cafe albums
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No longer serves a purpose for navigation as the four blue links now redirect to World Cafe (radio program)#Live at the World Cafe, due to lack of notability of the individual albums of this series. Lennart97 (talk) 12:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Substub
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A previous version was deleted at TfD a long while ago (Wikipedia:Historical archive/Template:Substub is the historical version). The current creation misrepresents policy, saying that substub "will be deleted in 7 days". This has no basis in policy. A PROD may result in deletion in 7 days, however it is a separate process from this template and is not connected to substub status. Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 12:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Clearly says something that is contrary to policy. Not sure "substub" is well defined anyway. WP:ACSD has the criteria for articles. Nigej (talk) 13:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- delete speedily, preferably. This has no place on WP as it contravenes existing policy. We have no deletion policy on substubs. CUPIDICAE💕 15:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a CSD. Anything that is really below a stub in size would be covered by CSD A1 (no context) or A3 (no content). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is what A1 and A3 are for. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. After all these years, I finally see a template that would have actually met WP:T2. I've found one use of the template, on Paul Bergé, which I have now removed. – Uanfala (talk) 01:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Uanfala:, I'll do you one better, look at User:Eostrix/CSD log, I got Template:Admin page T2ed in June 2020. I would've T2ed substub as well, for a doubling up on T2, but sadly this criteria has been removed (I missed the discussion I think, probably would've voted against, misrepresenting policy can be a big deal if splattered on many pages or with a really searchable name).--Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).