< November 26 November 28 >

November 27

Template:Country data Chinese Communist Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Country data templates are not used for political parties or organisations. Originally thought to merge with Template:Country data China, but that would set a precedent for merging political flags with country data, the implementation of which would be biased towards whatever party is ruling or dominant at the moment. Such a categorisation would not be in-line with Wikipedia policy, so I propose a deletion. CentreLeftRight ✉ 21:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Universe Myanmar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation template that no remaining navigation. All year links were redirected to the main Miss Universe Myanmar article per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Myanmar 2013. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Find sources/links/archive.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:Find sources/links. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging the above with Module:Find sources/links.
The above modules hold config data for a specific search entry. Each entry is further split into a main module and a /autodoc module. These can all be merged into one config module, as I've done here, with relevant changes to Module:Find sources/sandbox and Module:Find sources/autodoc/sandbox. Gonnym (talk) 11:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MTime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused wrapper around the ((#time)) function. It is better and clearer just to use the parser function directly. (TimeOffset is a subtemplate of this which just takes a substring so didn't need to be a seperate template anyway.) User:GKFXtalk 08:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tõlliste Parish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the navigation box is used anymore. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Trapezoidnotation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is mainly because it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - templates that effectively just insert a single image are not useful. User:GKFXtalk 11:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Too many boxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. ✗plicit 12:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Too small

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth noting that it is unused. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timelines by year

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I always think that it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. User:GKFXtalk 11:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Australian Open Women's Singles Winners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not use, guys. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tdy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not used, we should delete it. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TTF tabs old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, the template is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. User:GKFXtalk 11:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SwedishMilitaryRanks EnglishTranslation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's no longer used! Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sectionanchor.hide.css

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that this section should be deleted because it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sectionanchor.css

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is not currently in use. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cmbox/styles.css

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. ✗plicit 12:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FAR history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by creator. DrKay (talk) 08:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's never been used, that's all. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JRowling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to /FAQ Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use talk page template. Either subst and delete, or move without redirect to something like Talk:J. K. Rowling/FAQ and transclude it from there. I favor the latter, as the point of putting this in a template is reducing the excessive front-matter source code at the top of the article's talk page. We just don't need anything like this in the template namespace since it has no other uses on any other pages and never will, not even on other articles connected to Rowling.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support - either moving or substing into talk space is fine. User:GKFXtalk 11:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Convert to FAQ and move to /FAQ page. This looks like a standard FAQ so should move to that page and use the relevant FAQ templates. Gonnym (talk) 12:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DemoTemplate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-oh, it's not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 02:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Duanwu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not being used, okay. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 02:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused wrapper around Template:Ctime:x. The code is simple enough (((ctime:x|2021|5|5)) → 2021-06-14) that it can just be written out directly anywhere it is later required. User:GKFXtalk 11:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox/title.css

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So in fact, this templete was not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 02:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree since the solution from this TemplateStyle is already integrated into MediaWiki. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 03:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox/biography-styles.css

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear what this template is for and it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 02:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox/styles.css

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, we did not use it. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 01:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
More