Template:Peg Solitaire interactive solution guide.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not an actual template. Should be substituted or changed into [[File:...]] --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Subst and delete per nom. Single use image template which is a simple imagemap. Gonnym (talk) 10:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm curious why the template I based this one on - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Subtraction_game_SMIL.svg - has not been deleted since 2015? The usage is identical, to take anyone clicking on the thumbnail of it in an article directly to the interactive SVG, as opposed to just the File: page showing just a non-interactive PNG snapshot of it. Mardeg (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Playable Fox Chook Corn puzzle.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not an actual template. Should be substituted or changed into [[File:...]] --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Subst and delete per nom. Single use image template which is a simple imagemap. Gonnym (talk) 10:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Subst and delete per Gonnym Rlink2 (talk) 16:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm curious why the template I based this one on - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Subtraction_game_SMIL.svg - has not been deleted since 2015? The usage is identical, to take anyone clicking on the thumbnail of it in an article directly to the interactive SVG, as opposed to just the File: page showing just a non-interactive PNG snapshot of it. Mardeg (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Memer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Horribly designed by a now-banned user. WP:BMB. ––FormalDude talk 19:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Userboxes shouldn't be in the template space anyway, and it looks like it wont get more transclusions. Rlink2 (talk) 16:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:SHM lines
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Shanghai Metro Frietjes (talk) 21:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. Gonnym (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, clearly obsolete. JackPotte (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:NYCFC II squad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 03:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate of Template:New York City FC II squad Joeykai (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Nothing but red. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for same reasons at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 March 27#Template:New York City FC II squad. GiantSnowman 11:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: first of all, apologies for the delayed response. Unfortunately I've got a lovely case of sciatica right now and this is the first time in over a week that I've felt capable of sitting up for long enough to so much as read the message, let alone respond to it. Please note that the template I made was provisional - at the time the team was still being put together. There were only a few names on it because the club hadn't signed the players. They have now, so this template can be bulked out. What's more, the team has played a competitive match, meaning all players involved are eligible now for Wikipedia articles so those red links can start going away. I can't promise to create all of the articles overnight, because I put effort into what I do (read: it takes me hours to even write one stub-class article) and, as mentioned, I have sciatica. However, if you can wait a few weeks you should see this template looking a lot better. Falastur2 Talk 22:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe userfy until then so you can work on making this more useful when that point comes down the road. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete duplicate of Template:Cycling data 194 (old UCI code), clear way for redirect to UCN. Benjamin112 ☎ 22:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per request same team so delete for redirect.Paulpat99 (talk) 23:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (no need for redirect since nothing is transcluding it) Rlink2 (talk) 16:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
