< April 10
April 12 >

April 11

Template:Member states of the European Union sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We already have Template:Member states of the European Union. It is not necessary to have two templates with the same function. DrKay (talk) 20:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Premature NBA standings templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. If someone wants them in draft or userspace, let me know. Or, feel free to recreate them once there are season articles instead of all redlinks. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These were all completely broken until I created the template:2023–24 NBA team standings by copying template:2022–23 NBA team standings (should probably be merged into one template). in my opinion, we should wait until some of the season articles are started before creating the standings templates. so, maybe move these to draft space? or, recreate them after the finals for this season? Frietjes (talk) 19:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2016 Summer Paralympics volleyball convenience templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

per the current convention for Olympics and Paralympics articles, the game and standings templates should be hosted in the parent article, and not in individual templates. if consensus changes over LST vs templates, we can always put all the matches and standings into a single template with a switch so we don't need to watch 20 templates per event. Frietjes (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

College baseball class-/position-specific award navboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per established consensus at related mass-TfD (see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 24#College softball class-/position-specific award navboxes). SportsGuy789 (talk) 03:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Merger of Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency and Infobox Lok Sabha Constituency.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox Indian constituency. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency and Template:Infobox Lok Sabha Constituency with Template:Infobox Indian constituency.

This is a proposal to merge the Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency and Infobox Lok Sabha Constituency under a common new template, "Infobox Indian constituency", which represents both of the Infoboxes.

These Two Infoboxes were created for India's parliamentary constituencies: one for use on the pages of the Lok Sabha, India's Lower House, and the other for use on the pages of the Rajya Sabha, India's Upper House. While both InfoBoxes are compact in size, they differ only in four to five parameters, with all other parameters performing almost same functions.

Utilizing an integrated InfoBox would facilitate easy data maintenance, allowing for modification or enhancement as needed. As both InfoBoxes perform essentially the same function with only minor variations, these differences could be seamlessly integrated into a merged version. We can also use the same parameters according to different labels by mentioning the type of the Constituencies, as well as The Uppercase and lowercase parameters in both templates can also be used to specify the corresponding label in a case-specific manner.

It can be a drop-in merger and upon completion, we can redirect both template pages to the newly merged template. Then If needed, the new infobox can replace the previous ones on used pages. However, even if not replaced, the old ones will still be displayed accurately. ( In my opinion )

While it is true that there may be no need to fix something that is not broken, it is also worth noting that using two almost identical infoboxes with some differences may not yield any significant benefits, especially if both infoboxes do not have any discernible formatting differences that help to distinguish between the two type of constituencies.

So should these two be merged?(with each other or into a new one) Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anglo-Saxon time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Template:Anglo-Saxon time and Keep Template:Anglo-Saxon months. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Anglo-Saxon time with Template:Anglo-Saxon months.
Same subject matter - redundant information. Ingwina (talk) 20:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
More