The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:52, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Blocked user (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It has been three years since this template was deprecated. At this point, I do not think it serves anyone anymore to have this placeholder telling which template to use or not. Regularly editing users should be well aware of the alternatives, and this will just cause more confusion for interlanguage as well, who come across this page and wonder why there is this confusing red box or smth that they do not understand. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 15:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete agreed its useless and unneeded and is unneeded even for page history reasons Qwv (talk) 10:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Don't need this anymore, and it probably could've been deleted a while ago. ((ping|ClydeFranklin)) (t/c) 02:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – it seems that this page is still used frequently; pageviews have not dropped off too much since the deprecation. Perhaps reconfigure to make this a more general disambiguation page, as given that views have in general remained pretty steady, it seems like lots of editors are coming here looking for a different template – perhaps ((uw-block)), I don't know (this ignorance despite being a regularly editing user). J947 † ^edits 08:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That is probably because of the interlanguage links. Once the template is gone from the interlanguage directory the views will probably go away as well. :) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 20:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I just checked select pageview counts for this template in other languages. It seems that combining all non-English-language versions of this template together yields approximately twice as many views as the en.wp template – an estimate. Nowhere near 1 in 2 users viewing a template will click a specific link on the interlanguage directory. Maybe 1 in 20. J947 † ^edits 23:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G5 Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lovejoy (band) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There's only two articles for the band's releases in existence (the others aren't notable, at least yet) aside from the band and the main member (Wilbur Soot) having articles. This was created WP:TOOSOON. WP:NENAN. Ss112 09:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — as per discussion. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 10:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: Deleted per WP:CSD#G5.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Diplomatic missions in Antigua and Barbuda (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails the first function of a navbox. Too few links. DrKay (talk) 08:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Indefblockedip (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Barely used template. I see no reason why we need to tag IPs like this when Special:BlockList exists, and we can even filter. Very few IPs are blocked indefinitely, and the ones that are are because of repeated block evasion or because they are open proxies. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 00:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).