The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Three Flavours Cornetto trilogy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Don't really think we need this. Well-served by ((Edgar Wright)) --woodensuperman 14:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Clear duplication. Can readily be covered by the template noted. Nigej (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ONDAR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Little more than WP:PERFNAV --woodensuperman 14:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tommy Reilly (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only links three articles, not enough to warrant a navbox. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 14:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Articles readily link to each other without the need for a navbox. Nigej (talk) 17:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Just Duet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with no main article and only one transclusion. Delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. In addition, the only links in the navbox fail WP:PERFNAV anyway. Utterly useless. --woodensuperman 13:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jan Czekanowski racial definitions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-article template with no parameters, documentation, or categories. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Subst/delete per nom. Single-use article content. Nigej (talk) 17:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Viktoria Modesta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only links three articles. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 12:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ashley Roberts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only links three articles WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 12:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cr-big (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No need for this template, which just makes the flag icons unnecessarily large. The standard templates ((Cr)) and ((Cr-rt)) work perfectly fine, and the big flag doesn't add any benefit compared to these, and is worse, since it doesn't have a right equivalent template (which means that they display completely differently to every other cricket match). There are only 17 mainspace usages of this template, compared to thousands of usages for the correct templates. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this template is similar to ((Fb-big)), ((bk-big)), ((vb-big)), ((hb-big)) and all other team sports have the same template. it's not about keeping this or that (((Cr))) each of them has it's own use. This style is used for certain event results tables including the main World Cup page, if you don't like it simply don't use it. Sports2021 (talk) 11:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I can see that there's an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument for keeping, but fundamentally this seems to be an excessive use of flags. Does its use in 2007 ICC World Twenty20#Final serve any useful purpose? Not at all IMO. Nigej (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. Template doesn't seem to serve any useful purpose. Cr-rt and Cr is enough for cricket articles. Robo^Cric Let's chat 07:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).