Template:2022–23 Czech First League table
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not used and not updated. The season article uses an embedded table, which is transcluded on team season pages. CRwikiCA talk 21:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
College rivalry navboxes
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NENAN. Minimal navigational value. In all cases, these links are also found group together on separate individual team navboxes - in some cases, there is only one or two links that are not duplicated on another template. fuzzy510 (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unneeded; same for the other nominated rivalry navboxes. Fuzzy510, it is possible to group similar templates in one category to make it easier to discuss. CRwikiCA talk 20:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I didn't think I was going to nominate this many of them, or have such similar rationale on all of them. I'll group them now. fuzzy510 (talk) 20:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey CRwikiCA, just wanted to let you know that I added a couple navboxes since you had stated your opinion (I merged everything a tad too quickly). I doubt your mind will change, but for the sake of transparency, I wanted to make you aware. -fuzzy510 (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Fuzzy510, that makes it a lot easier. I still support delete as these are not needed. CRwikiCA talk 20:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete as pure overkill. Not everything needs a navbox fer cryin' out loud. SportsGuy789 (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – there are a slew of these types of navboxes that are untagged for deletion, sitting in Category:American school rivalry navigational boxes. And that parent category ought to get deleted too once the navboxes are gone. SportsGuy789 (talk) 06:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- There were a couple that I thought might have the barest amount of relevance, but since there seems to be a lot of enthusiasm to delete them (which I share), I'll bring the rest here shortly. -fuzzy510 (talk) 02:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Completely crazy WP:TCREEP. As noted above all the others ought to go too. This whole "rivalry" area is massively bloated. Nigej (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused after replaced with ((Cat main)) and ((Navseasoncats)). –Aidan721 (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2012 Summer Paralympics convenience template navbox navbox
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
not useful after so many of its entries were deleted. Frietjes (talk) 18:54, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No longer useful. Nigej (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there is no use, Category:2012 Summer Paralympics convenience template navigational boxes can be deleted as well. CRwikiCA talk 16:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2012 Summer Paralympics volleyball convenience templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
per the current convention for Olympics and Paralympics articles, the game and standings templates should be hosted in the parent article, and not in individual templates. if consensus changes over LST vs templates, we can always put all the matches and standings into a single template with a switch so we don't need to watch 27 templates per event. Frietjes (talk) 18:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Based on evaluation, the use of templates for a specific match does not appear to provide any meaningful benefit. Therefore, I recommend discontinuing the use of these templates and then Delete Tojoroy20 (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Oklahoma City Thunder staff
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleting the template seems reasonable since it is only being used for a single page. Tojoroy20 (talk) 20:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Post-election pendulum for the 2023 New South Wales state election
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Moved by User:Thiscouldbeauser to Post-election pendulum for the 2023 New South Wales state election Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. Since there are no template parameters and only one usage. Tojoroy20 (talk) 20:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- We have articles for other pendulums, such as Post-election pendulum for the 2022 Australian federal election. I'd suggest moving the template to an article. So, I must say this: do not delete this template until it is replaced by an article. Pinging @GarbageKarate (the template's creator) for comment. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 03:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:UEFA Country coefficient (Cyprus)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Substed to article, unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unused and don't seem to be useful for more than one article. And if so, can be transcluded from page. CRwikiCA talk 20:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:EUVBQ2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Substed to article with attribution, unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:EUVBQ2019
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
substed, unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 12:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:EUVBQ2017
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
substed, unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 12:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merged into article, now unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 11:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merged to article, now unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 11:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merged to article with attribution, now unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 11:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merged into article with attribution, now unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 10:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Statistics UEFA Intertoto Cup (Cyprus)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merged into the article with attribution, now unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 10:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:EUVBWQ2019
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Substed with attribution, now unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 09:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:EUVBWQ2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Substed with attribution, now unused. Pelmeen10 (talk) 09:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).