Template:Ala Hazrat family completed
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and unsourced family tree chart. Happy to consider userfication if not ready. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Numidia dynasty
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All redlinks in Arabic. No use here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Paraná Clube squad
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Blanked last month as the club has been demoted to a bottom tier level. No links for any notable team members. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Santa Cruz Futebol Clube squad
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Contains no links. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and only contains two direct links related to the subject. No navigation with this sidebar. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and not needed. Ōminato Line has a route map in the infobox on the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: now used in parent article. (Apparently Henrygg98 forgot to replace the hardcoded diagram when he originally extracted it.) Useddenim (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Husiatyn Raion
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All of these raions were abolished in 2020. The links featured in these navboxes have been replaced by other navboxes. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:TLE
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created a few weeks ago by a mostly inactive editor. Possibly an experiment; OK to userfy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Imported it from other language wikis, feel free to do anything, I don't care (as I am mostly inactive editor). Euglenos sandara (talk) 14:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:South Indian deities
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overlapping with ((Hindu deities and texts)). No clear distinction of deities as South Indian; most are pan-Indian, pan-Hindu deities Redtigerxyz Talk 06:37, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:AI-generated images
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and unneeded. If an image is usable under Wikipedia:Image use policy and works as an illustrative aid under Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images, that image may be used without regard for how it was made, and there is no problem with that image being machine-generated. Whatever problem may be perceived can not be solved by providing "proper attribution" textually in the article itself, and there is no requirement for such attribution for such images, just as there is no requirement for such attribution for any other images. And requiring such attribution would worsen the articles, burdening them with unnecessary text. If an image has copyright problems it should be deleted. This template can't do anything about that. —Alalch E. 01:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There appear to be far fewer AI images in articles than were expected (when omitting the ones used specifically to describe AI topics). 3df (talk) 20:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:AI-generated sources
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:49, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and redundant to Template:Unreliable sources. This is just about unreliable sources. A separate template listing one reason why sources used would be unreliable, but there are many reasons for a source to be an unreliable source, and separate templates are not needed for each of those scenarios. There is nothing special about sources which are unreliable for this reason relative to unreliable sources in general in terms of practical implications. —Alalch E. 01:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- This may be better as an inline tag. Something like [AI-generated source?]. --Trialpears (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
((Unreliable source?)) and ((Better source needed)) cover inline use.—Alalch E. 15:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, but the more important question is if it's more useful. It can be easier to deal with the problem if you know exactly what's wrong. It's faster to recognize AI generated text if told to look for it for instance. --Trialpears (talk) 17:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- A new tag like that could be helpful if it's possible the contents of the source itself are AI generated in a problematic way. For a source that might not exist, I had been wondering if a [nonexistent source?] inline would be appropriate. 3df (talk) 18:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Trialpears. This seems like it would function better as an inline tag to better identify the specific problems. TheBritinator (talk) 23:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; no objection to creation of an inline tag if people think it'd be useful. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:55, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I concur with Nikkimaria even though I brought up the inline tags above. Trialpears (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.