- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused after being merged with the parent article use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:2018 Asian Games men's football group A standings
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused after being merged with the parent article use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:2018 Asian Games women's football group A standings
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused after being merged with the parent article use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Twinkle rollback and related templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. These templates appear to have been superseded by formatting provided by the Twinkle code, per this discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. These templates are missing from testwiki, and the relevant text still appears in testwiki Twinkle, suggesting that these templates are not used by Twinkle. In the code, looks like Twinkle is building the links internally using
Twinkle.fluff.linkBuilder.buildLink(). I think it'd be OK to delete these. –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Zerbu Talk 23:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Tv small
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, documentation, incoming links from discussions, or template parameters. Created in 2008. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Austin John Winkler
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I previously nominated this in a merge request with ((Hinder)) last year and the proposal ended in no consensus. Since then, this navbox has been cleaned up and with only one other directly-related article left, seems unnecessary. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I've long thought this template was unnecessary. Several of the articles it originally contained have been redirected over time, and to be honest, the one EP that is left doesn't pass WP:NALBUM either and will probably also be redirected at some point. The related articles are either songs that the subject sang on when he was the vocalist for Hinder and are already in the band's navbox, or articles that the subject has a distant relationship with, such as providing guest backing vocals... some of them don't even mention him. Richard3120 (talk) 08:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Smashing Satellites
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A band with only one album and no articles for any of its member doesn't require a navigational box. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).