The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Keep. The ((uw-biog)) set of templates is specific with respect to not adding reliable sourcing with respect to living people, while the ((uw-defamatory)) series can also be about libel/defamation of corporate entities and dead people. It's much more flexible, and the two are not redundant as assumed by someone who's wrong on the internet. — Red-tailed hawk(nest) 04:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I was just wondering, WikiCleanerMan, do you ever have an argument at TfD that isn't "per nomination"? And do you ever actually vote Keep in any of these discussions? SilverserenC 19:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Has 3000 substs. Appears to be well-used. Runs afoul a bit with the spirit of WP:NOLEGALTHREATS though. Not sure editors should be throwing words like defamation and libel around. I am undecided. –Novem Linguae (talk) 19:24, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You are perfectly within your rights to say that in your opinion, an edit is defamatory. You are talking about the edit, not the user. CapnZapp (talk) 23:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep There is a distinct difference in usage that the nominator doesn't address and conflates with BLP. SilverserenC 19:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Merge per nom (consistency; old consensus to merge the prehistoric templates because "There was no Spain in prehistoric times. There was no Portugal either"). —Alalch E. 19:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Inactive Gold Mines in Western Australia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2012 Summer Paralympics football 7-a-side team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2012 Summer Paralympics football 5-a-side team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2012 Summer Paralympics volleyball team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2016 Summer Paralympics wheelchair basketball team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2012 Summer Paralympics wheelchair basketball team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:2016 Summer Paralympics Sweden wheelchair rugby team roster
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2012 Summer Paralympics goalball team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2016 Summer Paralympics goalball team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:58, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2016 Summer Olympics field hockey team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2016 Summer Olympics handball team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2016 Summer Olympics basketball team roster templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
unused after being merged with the parent article and transcluding pages updated to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete unused templates after merger of content that belongs in the article with the article and adjustments of transclusions on other pages. —Alalch E. 20:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I oppose all implementation of LST until this process is discussed with the community at large. All removals of the above templates in the relevant articles should be reverted. SilverserenC 03:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom. It was just repetitive data and thus WP:LST is more appropriate, because templates should be used for standardized or navigational repetitive content, see Help:Template. Irecorsan (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).