The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Backlog. Izno (talk) 01:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Admin backlog (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Backlog (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Admin backlog with Template:Backlog.
I think admin backlog can just call something like ((backlog|admin=yes)) to indicate that yes there is an admin backlog. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 23:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I don't think there is any technical issues with this request, I'll just note that apparently some tools utilize these templates directly, so care should be taken not to break anything. —Locke Cole • t • c 23:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. I concur that this can easily be done w/ parameters of ((backlog)), however it may be worth turning this into a wrapper to prevent anything breaking. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 14:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support and use a parameter as per nom. I don't foresee any major issues with using the template in this way. ToThAc (talk) 18:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, should be easy to do, although this may cause a lot of pages to break temporarily. interstatefive  16:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Gangrene (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless WP:NENAN. Muhandes (talk) 11:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 08:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Film Studios in India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This violates WP:NAVBOX as the majority of subjects are not closely related. It could be converted into a list. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The navbox contains a single, coherent subject, and serves to provide a useful navigational purpose to readers. The mere creation of a list of film studios in India would serve to make this more compliant with WP:NAVBOX, so the argument that a list should be created seems confused. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 21:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The only other such template Template:Film studios navbox lists almost all that have ever existed or at least have an article on Wikipedia from the U.S. and Canada. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).