The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Since last reviewed, the PIT article has grown in many ways and now contains extensive information about both terminals at the airport. Also constantly kept up-to-date are all of the destinations which I, as well as several other users, constantly update as needed. I feel that the last rating, "Start," does not fit as there are airport articles much worse off than PIT which have the same rating. I feel it was added haphazardly without paying much attention to its actual content. NW036 04:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• More references needed
• Expand "Cargo" section.
• A few more pictures would be nice.
• Some External Links should be changed to References.

Overall it is a great article and should be nominated for GA after this review. Marcusmax 19:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.