Not much else I can add to the article in terms of information and cited everything I could: I completed remade the old one from the ground up. Only place for sales info was VGChartz.com, but that's apparently been ruled out...there's also seemingly no way to find information regarding when production of the game ceased. Aiming to get a featured article out of this when all done, so any feedback or points to adjust and improve it would be helpful all around.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 12:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Look at merging the first two paragraphs of the Lead together. Add a paragraph on the game's reception and critical response. I think that the lead should be free from citations, as it should essentially summarise what's in the body of the article
• Summarise the object of the game in the start of the gameplay section so that the reader can understand the relevance of the mechanics descriptions.
• Have a look at tightening up the gameplay section. There are a couple of one or two sentence paragraphs that might be worth adding to the previous one. Also check through for redundant phrasing.
• Check through for grammar - I've fixed a couple of areas, but there might be other issues. If you can, whack it through a grammar checker.
• Reception - Despite negative reviews, the game did sell well though it was never re-released as a Nintendo Player's Choice title. - are there any sales figures to back this up? What does the breakdown of review figures in EGM mean? Was there any talk about the game's audio? Is there anything else that could be mentioned in this section?

Overall, it's clear to see there's been some great work in this article and it's definitely progressing well.