Use this page to discuss information on the page (and subpages) attached to this one. This includes limited discussion of the Arbitration Committee itself, as a body. Some things belong on other pages:

requesting arbitration: WP:A/R
discussing finalised decisions of the committee: WT:ACN
discussing pending decisions: find the proceedings page at Template:Casenav
discussing the process of arbitration: WT:A/R

This Arbitration Committee has been mentioned by a media organization:

Ramey, Corinne (May 7, 2018). "The 15 People Who Keep Wikipedia's Editors From Killing Each Other". Wall Street Journal.

Wikipedia Arbitration

About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)

Track related changes
v t e

Standardising arbitration enforcement procedures (April 2017)

Original discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Arbitration enforcement and discretionary sanctions

The following sections are moved (word for word) from the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions procedure to the Committee's procedures page (under the "Enforcement" heading) and as such apply to all arbitration enforcement actions (including discretionary sanctions and actions enforcing arbitration case remedies):

The "Expectations of administrators" section
The "Dismissing an enforcement request" section

A note is to be placed prominently on the discretionary sanctions procedure noting that the Enforcement provisions on the Committee's procedures page also apply to the application and enforcement of discretionary sanctions.

Appeals and modifications

The "Appeals and modifications" in the discretionary sanctions procedure is modified to reflect the current version standard provision for appeals and modifications, including changes made to it in future amendments (Template:Arbitration standard provisions may be used).

Voting (standardising)

For this motion there are 13 active arbitrators. With 0 arbitrators abstaining, 7 support or oppose votes are a majority.

Majority reference
Abstentions	Support votes needed for majority
0–1	7
2–3	6
4–5	5

Enacted - Miniapolis 18:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Given that the only two comments are positive looks like we can get this done now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Euryalus (talk) 11:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Doug Weller talk 16:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mkdw ^talk 18:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kirill Lokshin (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DGG ( talk ) 19:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Opabinia regalis (talk) 23:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Abstain

Discussion (standardising)

Seems sane to me. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 13:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Standardizing things usually reduces confusion, so yeah, this sounds fine. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.