The main reason seems to be not notable company and product. Mainly this is because there are no apparent third party unbiased articles. This is partially true I must admit. Though IKAN does have obvious partnerships with notable companies, for example they created and sold a product which is now owned by Oracle (a notable company).
Application Lifecycle Management is a well known term in application development and a term which seems to be notable enough on its own (hence the page). The IKAN ALM software is Application Lifecycle Management software, yet it is different from the rest because it allows the existing development environment of any company to be upgraded to ALM, instead of forcing the client to use new software.
By the way, this software runs in large international companies. Most of the companies in this industry listed on Wikipedia should also be deleted then, because of the same reasons. Best Regards (Johan Van Camp (talk) 09:09, 8 February 2011 (UTC)).
I have added some more references regarding the other product. To avoid confusion, if one would encounter the name Minerva somewhere ,it is a distributor of IKAN. (Johan Van Camp (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC))