This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NonvocalScream. |
![]() |
This is the User talk page for NonvocalScream, where you can send messages and comments to NonvocalScream. |
|
|
Please leave a message and sign your posts! Thank you! NonvocalScream (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
The article I have been working on has been deleted without reason. Someone say "cross wiki spam". This is stupid. The article has been aproved at the english wp, well referenced, and it is a vandalism from a Dutch user, calle MoiraMoira, who is deleting the article or recomending to other collegues who obviously are not investigating the matter. --Lolox76 (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello NonvocalScream,
I wasn't sure how to reply to your question on the changing-username page, so I am answering here. I am new to Wikipedia and have realised that my username on other pages are all equal except for Wikipedia, so I wanted to change it. I dont know where to request the change on my home wiki, to be honest, could you tell me where that would be please? Thanks for your help MadameBruxelles (talk) 18:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
After you asked me on IRC, I have restored your admin and crat flag. You resigned them for valid reasons and were not under a cloud, so granted! :) fr33kman 17:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for placing the block on Racepacket. I hate to see anyone get blocked or banned, but it was just getting out of hand. Question: Was I correct to put a request like that on Simple Talk, or should I have brought it to Administrator's Notice board? Just trying to make sure I get it right, but hoping I don't have to make a habit of it. --Gotanda (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Didn't want to tag it for deletion, but noticed you have a broken redirect on a subpage of yours. Up to you if you want to delete or move or create etc... :) Kind regards Ydennek (talk) 12:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
I just noticed you removed my flood flag. That's OK, but I hadn't forgotten I was supposed to let you know when I was through. Did I do something to get my privilege revoked? --Auntof6 (talk) 03:54, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
On both wikis I have put up a total of over 1000 new pages. In the course of this I have developed a technique which works for me. I return to a new page two or three times in the week or fortnight after putting it up. This is because the distance helps me get perspective. With Plover you jumped before I had a chance to re-edit. You have every right to complain if my pages are too complex. (But on the other hand, I do know how to edit!). Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Why did you changed the abuse filter number 12 (this) to tag only again? it is working fairly well, and stuff created usually gets deleted. Why is the change needed to watch this for a while? -Barras (talk) 15:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
You mentioned that the page is little more than a dictionary definition. I agree, but I've seen a lot of pages like that here on SimpleWiki. That made me think it was more acceptable here. Is that not so? For example, I keep seeing articles for the 850 simple words, and many of those are pretty much just definitions. Just wondering. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
You asked why I didn't leave it at DYK. Because I thought he needed to be blocked. DYK talk is no place to discuss blocks/topic bans, and half of my beef (and all of Jona's) was about non-DYK stuff. Oh, why was it closed before Jona got a chance to answer your question? Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 02:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
---> AN. Jon@talk:~$ 04:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Jon
Can you have a look at my request here. Thank you very much. Best regards--Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 16:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello NonvocalScream! I don't think I've ever talked to you before, so I just dropped by to say hello. :) –Orashmatash 19:41, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
I updated the QD. Please reconsider deleting it. πr2 (talk • changes) 03:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello Jon. I'm not sure quite how you arrived at the conclusion that there was no consensus for a community ban of PBP. There's already a very clear indication of such a consensus forming at Simple Talk, with something like ten regular editors in favour of a community ban and one in favour of a six-month block. The purpose of the indef block was to allow this discussion to conclude before making a final decision on the block duration. Perhaps you simply were not aware of the discussion but your comment about no consensus for a ban is quite mistifying to me. I will not adjust your block duration (i.e. I won't wheel-war) but I would ask you to read the ban discussion and re-consider your appraisal of no consensus at this time. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Whenever you have the time. Regards, Albacore (talk · changes) 12:51, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Do you plan to expand this article? If not, I think it should be changed to redirect to Swimming. What do you think? --Auntof6 (talk) 03:25, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Afternoon. May I ask how your investigation into canvassing during my RfA has progressed? Normandie 12:48, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
At this point in time, I've found no credible evidence to support:
I find no reason to find the validity of the Request for Adminship to be in question. I am unable to substantiate any claim by the candidate that his RFA was canvassed directly or indirectly. I will submit to any private request for review by any crat. Regards, Jon@talk:~$ 03:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Please take part in the Capital City Weekend challenge. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 20:37, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
I was never a bureaucrat so I shouldn't have crat rights. Thanks for restoring the admin bit, by the way. Kansan (talk) 04:10, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
(show/hide) 12:21, 24 April 2011 Djsasso (talk | changes | block) changed group membership for User:Kansan from oversight and administrator to oversight, administrator and bureaucrat (promoted per Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Kansan)
So, color me confused :) Jon@talk:~$ 04:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
And, you are welcome. Jon@talk:~$ 04:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
A 680.000 char addition like "Ổm²ς" is usually intended to damage a page, and is considered flooding on any other project. My block was intended as a precaution and a safeguard to this project, especially because that IP Address was never active before. --M7 (talk) 21:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi NVS. I saw you approved my bot. Thanks a lot for that, but you didn't give it the flag. Did you do this on purpose? Thanks. -Orashmatash- 13:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
I was doing a minor edit to that page, since null editing it hadn't moved it out of Category:Articles with invalid date parameter in template. On en: the template is at ((Disambiguation))
rather than the short-cut ((Disambig))
, and to me using full words is clearer than abbreviations (even if they are obscure words). As far as the templates, by which I guess you mean stuff like ((Otheruses674))
they are something I'm still thinking about. They are left overs moved form en:, where even the pages they redirected to have been killed with fire. Probably the best move is to subst: them out with some kind of ((Hatnote))
. Rich Farmbrough, 23:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC).
I assume your comment was meant to be in the discussion area? I have moved it hoping this is correct? Kind regards Normandie 13:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello there. Please see my comment at Wikipedia talk:Requests for deletion/Requests/2011/Category:Complex pages as it may affect the final outcome. Best, Orashmatash (talk) 23:15, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Done I've adjusted the closure notes. Best, Jon@talk:~$ 23:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey scream, just wondering what your thinking was with regards to the above edit? In the spirit of BRD I've reverted the change as I couldn't understand where you were coming from, and in my opinion it makes perfect sense, though admittedly the entire spiel at the top is a relic of 'old' PGA that never got fully updated, so it could be slightly confusing and misleading to 'outsiders', which is something I will - eventually - get around to doing. A review of articles is supposed to take place when the article is nominated at PGA, and has never taken place at PR. PR was an additional, redundant process, which is why it was removed. AJona is particularly bitter about this and refuses to accept it's gone and to work with PGA the way it has always worked. I'd appreciate a little insight into your thinking, and will happily elaborate on any aspect of the process or statement if required. Thanks, Goblin 17:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Juliancolton!
Hi, glad to meet you and I have a little problem. Do you know who can make general English become simple English? I need a good guy. I'll thank you if you have a good list.--俠刀行 (talk) 19:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Hai sir
==Quick deletion of Wikipedia:Sandbox==
The page you wrote, Wikipedia:Sandbox, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add ((wait)) below the line ((QD)) and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 20:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Ferien (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Template:Wtf, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Template:Wtf and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Ferien (talk) 10:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC)